Swift vs TIAGo
Side-by-side comparison of Swift (IAM Robotics) and TIAGo (PAL Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- SwiftUnited States
- TIAGoSpain

Year First Available
- Swift2018
- TIAGo2016

Verified Deployments
- Swift0 Deployments
- TIAGo0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Price
- SwiftContact for quote
- TIAGo$29,000–$100,370 USD

Battery / Shift Runtime
- Swift8 hrs
- TIAGo5 hrs

Availability Status
- SwiftACTIVE
- TIAGoACTIVE

Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- Swift18.1 kg
- TIAGo3 kg

Max Speed
- Swift—
- TIAGo1 m/s

Autonomy Level
- Swift—
- TIAGofully autonomous

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United States | Spain |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2018 | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $29,000–$100,370 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | 5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 18.1 kg | 3 kg |
| Max Speed (values differ) | — | 1 m/s |
| Autonomy Level (values differ) | — | fully autonomous |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Reach, IP Rating
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Swift | TIAGo |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $64,685 |
| Payback period | — | 15.5 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $185,315 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +286% |
Swift has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Swift and TIAGo?
Swift is made by IAM Robotics, based in US. TIAGo is made by PAL Robotics, based in ES.
When were Swift and TIAGo launched?
Swift launched in 2018. TIAGo launched in 2016.
How do Swift and TIAGo compare on the Robo Index?
Swift grades A on the Robo Index. TIAGo grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between Swift and TIAGo?
Swift carries up to 18.14 kg. TIAGo carries up to 3 kg.
Are Swift and TIAGo in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Mobile Manipulator on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Swift and TIAGo?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The mobile manipulator vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The mobile manipulator vendor RFP: questions and red flags
10 min readMobile Manipulators
A 90-day playbook for your first mobile manipulation task
9 min readMobile Manipulators
Decision framework: mobile manipulator vs fixed arm vs AMR + manual
7 min readMobile Manipulators
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Swift vs TIAGo compares two robots in the mobile-manipulator category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.