Side-by-side comparison of T380AMR (Tennant) and UA-AC (Shandong UMW Technology Co., Ltd) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Verified Deployments

Price

Availability Status

Payload Capacity

Reach

Max Speed

IP Rating

| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United States | China |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $3,595–$107,561 USD | $18,999 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 50 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | — | 2,158 mm |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 1.7 m/s | — |
| IP Rating (values differ) | — | IP65 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Battery / Shift Runtime, Autonomy Level
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | T380AMR | UA-AC |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $55,578 | $18,999 |
| Payback period | 13.3 mo | 4.6 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $194,422 | $231,001 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +350% | +1216% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Frequently asked
T380AMR is made by Tennant, based in US. UA-AC is made by Shandong UMW Technology Co., Ltd, based in CN.
T380AMR grades AA on the Robo Index. UA-AC grades BB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Cleaning on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Cleaning TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cleaning robot TCO: hardware, consumables, and human-in-the-loop time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cleaning robot vendor evaluation: SLAs, fleet management, and reporting.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cleaning robot TCO: hardware, consumables, and human-in-the-loop time
8 min readCleaning Robots
Cleaning robot vendor evaluation: SLAs, fleet management, and reporting
10 min readCleaning Robots
Operator training: the line item most facilities skip
9 min readCleaning Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
T380AMR vs UA-AC compares two robots in the cleaning category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.