TORU vs Vecna ATG
Side-by-side comparison of TORU (Magazino) and Vecna ATG (Vecna Robotics, Inc.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
TORUDE
Vecna ATGUS
Year First Available
- TORU2016
- Vecna ATG—
Verified Deployments
- TORU0 Deployments
- Vecna ATG0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- TORU9 hrs
- Vecna ATG—
Availability Status
- TORUACTIVE
- Vecna ATGACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- TORU95 kg
- Vecna ATG—
AMR Subtype
- TORU—
- Vecna ATGtugger
Length
- TORU102.4 mm
- Vecna ATG—
Width
- TORU66.9 mm
- Vecna ATG—
Turning Radius
- TORU—
- Vecna ATG2,895 mm
Min Aisle Width
- TORU—
- Vecna ATG1,828 mm
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- TORUperception driven navigation based on simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM)
- Vecna ATG—
Battery
Opportunity Charging
- TORU—
- Vecna ATGYes
Commercial
Warranty
- TORU1 yrs
- Vecna ATG—
| TORUamr-warehouseMagazino 55.1Trust Score | Vecna ATGamr-warehouseVecna Robotics, Inc. 33.4Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | DE | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 9 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 95 kg | — |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | — | tugger |
| Length (values differ) | 102.4 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 66.9 mm | — |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | — | 2,895 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | — | 1,828 mm |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | perception driven navigation based on simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) | — |
| Battery | ||
| Opportunity Charging (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Chemistry, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Expected Service Life
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
TORU vs Vecna ATG compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.