TORU vs Vecna ATG
Side-by-side comparison of TORU (Magazino) and Vecna ATG (Vecna Robotics, Inc.) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- TORUGermany

- Vecna ATGUnited States

Year First Available
- TORU2016

- Vecna ATG—

Verified Deployments
- TORU0 Deployments

- Vecna ATG0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Price
- TORU$63,000 USD

- Vecna ATGContact for quote

Battery / Shift Runtime
- TORU9 hrs

- Vecna ATG—

Availability Status
- TORUACTIVE

- Vecna ATGACTIVE

Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- TORU95 kg

- Vecna ATG4,500 kg

AMR Subtype
- TORUother

- Vecna ATGtugger

Length
- TORU102.4 mm

- Vecna ATG—

Width
- TORU66.9 mm

- Vecna ATG—

Turning Radius
- TORU—

- Vecna ATG2,895 mm

Min Aisle Width
- TORU—

- Vecna ATG1,828 mm

Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- TORUother

- Vecna ATGother

Battery
Battery Chemistry
- TORUother

- Vecna ATGother

Opportunity Charging
- TORU—

- Vecna ATGYes

Commercial
Price (USD)
- TORU$63,000 USD

- Vecna ATGContact for quote

Warranty
- TORU1 yrs

- Vecna ATG—

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Germany | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $63,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 9 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 95 kg | 4,500 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | other | tugger |
| Length (values differ) | 102.4 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 66.9 mm | — |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | — | 2,895 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | — | 1,828 mm |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type | other | other |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry | other | other |
| Opportunity Charging (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $63,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | TORU | Vecna ATG |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $63,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 15.1 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $187,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +297% | — |
Vecna ATG has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes TORU and Vecna ATG?
TORU is made by Magazino, based in DE. Vecna ATG is made by Vecna Robotics, Inc., based in US.
How do TORU and Vecna ATG compare on the Robo Score?
TORU scores 73.4 on the Robo Score. Vecna ATG scores 53.3. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are TORU and Vecna ATG in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between TORU and Vecna ATG?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
TORU vs Vecna ATG compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.