TORU vs VNP 30
Side-by-side comparison of TORU (Magazino) and VNP 30 (VisionNav) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- TORUGermany
- VNP 30China
Year First Available
- TORU2016
- VNP 30—
Verified Deployments
- TORU0 Deployments
- VNP 300 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- TORU$63,000 USD
- VNP 30Contact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- TORU9 hrs
- VNP 30—
Availability Status
- TORUACTIVE
- VNP 30ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- TORU95 kg
- VNP 303,000 kg
AMR Subtype
- TORUother
- VNP 30pallet mover
Length
- TORU102.4 mm
- VNP 30—
Width
- TORU66.9 mm
- VNP 30—
Turning Radius
- TORU—
- VNP 302,020 mm
Min Aisle Width
- TORU—
- VNP 302,600 mm
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- TORUother
- VNP 30vision,visual slam
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- TORUother
- VNP 30—
Connectivity
WMS Integrations
- TORU—
- VNP 30WMS
Commercial
Price (USD)
- TORU$63,000 USD
- VNP 30Contact for quote
Warranty
- TORU1 yrs
- VNP 30—
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Germany | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $63,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 9 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 95 kg | 3,000 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | other | pallet mover |
| Length (values differ) | 102.4 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 66.9 mm | — |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | — | 2,020 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | — | 2,600 mm |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | other | vision,visual slam |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | other | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| WMS Integrations (values differ) | — | WMS |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $63,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | TORU | VNP 30 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $63,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 15.1 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $187,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +297% | — |
VNP 30 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes TORU and VNP 30?
TORU is made by Magazino, based in DE. VNP 30 is made by VisionNav, based in CN.
How do TORU and VNP 30 compare on the Robo Score?
TORU scores 73.4 on the Robo Score. VNP 30 scores 52.4. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are TORU and VNP 30 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between TORU and VNP 30?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
TORU vs VNP 30 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.