Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A MONARCH BRONCHOSCOPY PROCEDURE THE PHYSICIAN ENCOUNTERED SYSTEM FAULT MESSAGES AND ELECTED TO ABORT THE CASE. THERE WERE NO REPORTED CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED AFTER THE MONARCH BRONCHOSCOPY CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY PATIENT EXPERIENCED A PNEUMOTHORAX SAME DAY. CHEST TUBE IS BEING EMPLANED TO ADDRESS PNEUMOTHORAX. PHYSICIAN DOES NOT ATTRIBUTE THIS EVENT TO MONARCH AND CONSIDERS IT A NORMAL RISK OF A PLURAL TARGET.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: DURING A MONARCH BRONCHOSCOPY PROCEDURE, THERE WAS A SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN THE PATIENT'S VITAL SIGNS, PROMPTING INTERVENTION BY THE ANESTHESIOLOGIST. THE PATIENT, WHO WAS ELDERLY, EXPERIENCED A CARDIAC EVENT, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY ABORTED. THE ATTENDING PHYSICIAN CONFIRMED THAT THE PATIENT HAD SUFFERED A HEART ATTACK. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO THE CATH LAB AND, UNFORTUNATELY, PASSED AWAY LATER THAT DAY. IT IS NOTED THAT THE CLINICAL STAFF DOES NOT ATTRIBUTE THE PATIENT EVENT TO THE MONARCH ROBOT.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED DURING THE MONARCH BRONCHOSCOPY PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A BLEED. THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED THE BLEEDING WAS NOT DUE TO MONARCH BUT RATHER JUST A RISK OF BIOPSYING THIS SPECIFIC PATIENT. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED FOR OBSERVATION ONLY.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE MONARCH BRONCHOSCOPY PROCEDURE THE ARMS WERE STUCK IN STOW POSITION AND WILL NOT RESPOND. THE PHYSICIAN POWER CYCLED THE MONARCH SYSTEM A COUPLE OF TIMES AND RECONNECTED THE SYSTEM; HOWEVER, THERE WAS NO CHANGE. THE PHYSICIAN ELECTED TO ABORT THE CASE AND RESCHEDULE FOR A LATER DATE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF AN ADVERSE EVENT DUE TO SYSTEM ISSUES.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE PATIENT EXPERIENCE ABDOMINAL DISTENTION AND RESPIRATORY DISTRESS AND WAS HOSPITALIZE AND DRAIN PLACEMENT WAS PERFORM.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A MONARCH BRONCHOSCOPY PROCEDURE THERE WAS PATIENT COMPLICATIONS. THE PATIENT HAD SEVERE HYPOXEMIA. THE PHYSICIAN HIT A VESSEL. AFTER REMOVING THE SCOPE THE PATIENT STARTED TO HEMORRHAGE. THE PHYSICIAN STABILIZED THE HEMORRHAGE WITH A MANUAL SCOPE AND COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY. THE CHEST TUBE WAS PLACED AND PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED AND RELEASED.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ALL THE USERS PASSWORDS HAD EXPIRED AND THEY WERE UNABLE TO LOGIN TO THE MONARCH SYSTEM. THE PHYSICIAN ELECTED TO ABORT THE CASE AND RESCHEDULED.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHILE DRIVING IN THE RIGHT UPPER LOB (RUL), AND 25MM OUT FROM THE TARGET, USER DECIDED TO DO A SPIN TO CONFIRM HE WAS IN LINE WITH THE LESION AND GET READY TO PLACE A DYED COIL. THE SPIN WAS DONE AND THE SCOPE WAS OBSERVED TO BE THROUGH THE LUNG AND INTO THE PLEURAE WHILE THE SYSTEM WAS SHOWING THEY WERE 25MM OUT, RESULTING IN A PNEUMOTHORAX.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: THE CLINICAL SPECIALIST REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE LIVE CAMERA VIEW ON THE SCOPE SUDDENLY BECAME STATIC AND FUZZY, LEADING TO A LOSS OF VIEW. THE USER SWITCHED SCOPES AND SUCCESSFULLY NAVIGATED TO THE LESION. HOWEVER, WHILE BIOPSYING, AN FAULT OCCURRED, INDICATING DISCONNECTION OF THE SCOPE AND DISABLING OF ROBOTIC FUNCTIONS. DESPITE ATTEMPTS, THE USER COULDN'T TURN THE CAMERA BACK ON OR CLEAR THE ERROR. THE CLINICAL SPECIALIST MENTIONED THAT THE ISSUE RECURRED WITH THE SECOND SCOPE DURING BIOPSYING. CONSEQUENTLY, THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO END THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT FURTHER BIOPSIES. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT BECAUSE OF THE SCOPE ISSUES.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: THE CLINICAL SPECIALIST REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE LIVE CAMERA VIEW ON THE SCOPE SUDDENLY BECAME STATIC AND FUZZY, LEADING TO A LOSS OF VIEW. THE USER SWITCHED SCOPES AND SUCCESSFULLY NAVIGATED TO THE LESION. HOWEVER, WHILE BIOPSYING, AN FAULT OCCURRED, INDICATING DISCONNECTION OF THE SCOPE AND DISABLING OF ROBOTIC FUNCTIONS. DESPITE ATTEMPTS, THE USER COULDN'T TURN THE CAMERA BACK ON OR CLEAR THE ERROR. THE CLINICAL SPECIALIST MENTIONED THAT THE ISSUE RECURRED WITH THE SECOND SCOPE DURING BIOPSYING. CONSEQUENTLY, THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO END THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT FURTHER BIOPSIES. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT BECAUSE OF THE SCOPE ISSUES.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: DURING A DIAGNOSTIC MONARCH BRONCHOSCOPY, THE PHYSICIAN BIOPSIED SAMPLES AT THE RIGHT UPPER LOBE (RUL) 3CM FROM THE TARGET. AS THE PHYSICIAN REPOSITIONED THE BRONCHOSCOPE, A ROBOTIC ARM FAULT STATE OCCURRED. THE PHYSICIAN WAS NOT ABLE TO GET ALL OF HIS BIOPSIES DUE TO THIS FAULT CONDITION AND ELECTED TO ABORT THE CASE. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT BECAUSE OF THE SYSTEM ISSUES.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A PNEUMOTHORAX MEDIASTINAL. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED. HOWEVER, THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED DUE TO OTHER MEDICAL ISSUES, FOR OBSERVATION ONLY UNRELATED TO MONARCH DEVICE. THERE WERE NO FAULTS OR ISSUES REPORTED WITH THE MONARCH SYSTEM AND THE PHYSICIAN IS NOT ATTRIBUTING THE EVENT TO THE MONARCH.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A DIAGNOSTIC MONARCH BRONCHOSCOPY PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY WHILE DRIVING THROUGH THE BRONCHIAL ANATOMY TO THE TARGET LOCATION IN THE RIGHT UPPER LOBE (RUL). THE PATIENT ANATOMY REQUIRED THE BRONCHOSCOPE TO MANEUVER THROUGH A DIFFICULT/TIGHT SHARP TURN. THE MONARCH SYSTEM PRODUCED MULTIPLE FAULT CODES. THE PHYSICIAN WAS NOT ABLE TO REACH THE TARGET AND ELECTED TO ABORT THE DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT BECAUSE OF THE SYSTEM ISSUES.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: HELLO, THIS IS CONCERNING A DEFECTIVE MEDICAL DEVICE. THE DEVICE: THE MONARCH. MY PULMONOLOGIST USED IT AS HE HAD DONE WITH THE OTHER 300 PATIENTS BEFORE ME, TO PLACE A MARKER IN MY LUNG. I HAVE A POSSIBLE MALIGNANT NODULE. THE SURGEON WENT IN TO TAKE OUT THE NODULE BUT COULD NOT FIND IT. THE MARKER WAS IN THE WRONG PLACE!!! MY PULMONOLOGIST CALLED MONARCH BUT GOT NOWHERE. HE DID FIND OUT THEY HAD RECENTLY DID A SOFTWARE UPDATE. SOMETHING WAS DEFECTIVE IN THE MONARCH DEVICE USED. MY DOCTOR PUT IN A COMPLAINT WITH THE FDA. ANOTHER PROVIDER AT THE LUNG CLINIC, ALSO HAD A MALFUNCTION WITH THE MONARCH ON A RECENT PATIENT. HE ALSO REPORTED TO THE FDA. MY PULMONOLOGIST AND IS GROUP WILL BE TALKING WITH THE HOSPITAL ABOUT THIS DEVICE AND IF THEY SHOULD CONTINUE TO USE IT OR CHANGE TO SOMETHING ELSE. THE MONARCH MALFUNCTION HAS DERAILED EVERYTHING WITH MY CARE REGARDING GETTING THIS NODULE REMOVED. I HAVE SO MUCH INFLAMMATION SINCE THE SURGERY THAT I MUST WAIT UNTIL JUNE FOR ANOTHER CT (COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY) TO CHECK ON THE NODULE. OVER (B)(6) IN DOCTOR BILLS AND A SURGERY THAT I SHOULD NOT HAVE HAD BECAUSE OF THE DEFECT. **PROCEDURE OCCURRED AT (B)(6) OPERATING ROOM. THANK YOU, (B)(6). I H

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: DURING THE CLINICAL STUDY TRIAL CASE UNEXPECTED VIDEO QUALITY WAS OBSERVED ON URETEROSCOPE. THE UNEXPECTED VIDEO QUALITY CONSISTED OF BLURRINESS ON THE SYSTEM DISPLAY. THE BLURRY VISION WAS ONLY OBSERVED DURING MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (PCNL) PROCEDURE OF THE PRODUCT WORKFLOW, NAMELY DURING URETEROSCOPE DRIVING WITH THE LASER DRIVER COMPONENT CONNECTED. UPON REPLACEMENT OF THE URETEROSCOPE, NO FURTHER VIDEO ISSUES WERE OBSERVED AND THE USER COMPLETED THE CASE. UNDER PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION THE URETEROSCOPE WAS EXAMINED UNDER MAGNIFICATION, AT WHICH TIME IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE TOP LAYER OF THE CAMERA LENS WAS MISSING. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT BECAUSE OF THE SYSTEM ISSUES.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A MONARCH BRONCHOSCOPY PROCEDURE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A PNEUMOTHORAX IN THE RIGHT LUNG. A CHEST TUBE WAS PLACED AND PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED. THE FOLLOWING DAY THE CHEST TUBE WAS REMOVED AND THE PATIENT WAS RELEASED. THE PHYSICIAN STATED THAT THE SCOPE APPEARED TO BE KINKED AND THE PHYSICIAN ELECTED TO ABORT THE CASE.

Monarch Platform — Injury report filed with FDA (MAUDE). A MAUDE report does not establish that the device caused the outcome. Reported narrative: IT WAS REPORTED THAT REPORTED THAT THE NAVIGATION WAS NOT MATCHING UP WITH THE CIOS SPIN AND WAS ~30MM OFF FROM THE TARGET BUT THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. A PNEUMOTHORAX WAS DISCOVERED POST-OP AND THE PATIENT WAS NOT ADMITTED BUT A CHEST TUBE WAS PLACED. CHEST TUBE WAS REMOVED SAME DAY AND THE PATIENT WENT HOME SAME DAY. THERE WERE NO FAULTS OR ISSUES REPORTED WITH THE MONARCH SYSTEM AND THE PHYSICIAN IS NOT ATTRIBUTING THE EVENT TO THE MONARCH.