3D Sorter MAX vs EffiBOT
Side-by-side comparison of 3D Sorter MAX (Mushiny) and EffiBOT (Effidence) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- 3D Sorter MAXChina

- EffiBOTFrance

Year First Available
- 3D Sorter MAX—

- EffiBOT2015

Verified Deployments
- 3D Sorter MAX0 Deployments

- EffiBOT0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- 3D Sorter MAX—

- EffiBOT8 hrs

Availability Status
- 3D Sorter MAXACTIVE

- EffiBOTACTIVE

Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- 3D Sorter MAX—

- EffiBOT500 kg

AMR Subtype
- 3D Sorter MAXsorter amr

- EffiBOTunit load carrier

Length
- 3D Sorter MAX—

- EffiBOT1,450 mm

Width
- 3D Sorter MAX—

- EffiBOT660 mm

Turning Radius
- 3D Sorter MAX—

- EffiBOT1,200 mm

Min Aisle Width
- 3D Sorter MAX—

- EffiBOT3,300 mm

Robot Weight
- 3D Sorter MAX—

- EffiBOT140 kg

Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- 3D Sorter MAXother

- EffiBOTslam natural

Pedestrian Detection
- 3D Sorter MAX—

- EffiBOTYes

Battery
Battery Chemistry
- 3D Sorter MAXother

- EffiBOTli ion

Battery Capacity
- 3D Sorter MAX—

- EffiBOT1.6 kWh

Charging Time
- 3D Sorter MAX—

- EffiBOT3.5 hrs

Safety
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- 3D Sorter MAX—

- EffiBOT360 °

Connectivity
WMS Integrations
- 3D Sorter MAXWMS, WCS, MES, ERP

- EffiBOT—

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | France |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 500 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | sorter amr | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | — | 1,450 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 660 mm |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | — | 1,200 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | — | 3,300 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 140 kg |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | other | slam natural |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | other | li ion |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 1.6 kWh |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 3.5 hrs |
| Safety | ||
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | — | 360 ° |
| Connectivity | ||
| WMS Integrations (values differ) | WMS, WCS, MES, ERP | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Ground Clearance, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Runtime (Loaded), Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | 3D Sorter MAX | EffiBOT |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
3D Sorter MAX, EffiBOT have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes 3D Sorter MAX and EffiBOT?
3D Sorter MAX is made by Mushiny, based in CN. EffiBOT is made by Effidence, based in FR.
How do 3D Sorter MAX and EffiBOT compare on the Robo Score?
3D Sorter MAX scores 54.3 on the Robo Score. EffiBOT scores 72.0. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are 3D Sorter MAX and EffiBOT in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between 3D Sorter MAX and EffiBOT?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
3D Sorter MAX vs EffiBOT compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.