AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs Eva
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT A2 Ultra (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and Eva (Hanson Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AGIBOT A2 UltraChina
- EvaHong Kong
Year First Available
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Eva2014
Verified Deployments
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra0 Deployments
- Eva0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- AGIBOT A2 UltraContact for quote
- Eva$23,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Eva8 hrs
Availability Status
- AGIBOT A2 UltraACTIVE
- EvaACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra69 kg
- Eva9.5 kg
Height
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra169 mm
- Eva167 mm
Mobility Type
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrabipedal
- Evabipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrafull bipedal
- Evafull bipedal
Walking Speed
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra1.2 m/s
- Eva1.5 m/s
Stair Climbing
- AGIBOT A2 UltraNo
- Eva—
Terrain
- AGIBOT A2 Ultraflat indoor, uneven outdoor
- Evaboth
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra2 kg
- Eva0.6 kg
Total DOF
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra40
- Eva83
Arm DOF
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra7
- Eva15
Hand DOF
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra6
- Eva10
Arm Reach
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Eva60 cm
Bimanual Coordination
- AGIBOT A2 UltraNo
- Evaindependent
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- AGIBOT A2 UltraNVIDIA Jetson Orin 64G
- EvaNVIDIA Jetson Xavier AGX
Compute Platform
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- EvaIntel i7
VLM Capable
- AGIBOT A2 UltraNo
- Evacloud only
Foundation Models
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrafalse
- Eva—
Imitation Learning
- AGIBOT A2 UltraNo
- Eva—
Programming
- AGIBOT A2 UltraSmart OTA Upgrade
- Evavisual_block, code_python
Battery & Power
Runtime
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra3 hrs
- Eva8 hrs
Battery Swap
- AGIBOT A2 UltraYes
- Eva—
Safety
Human Detection Method
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Evavision human
Software
SDK Languages
- AGIBOT A2 UltraSmart OTA Upgrade
- Evavisual_block, code_python
ROS Support
- AGIBOT A2 UltraNo
- EvaYes
Open API
- AGIBOT A2 UltraNo
- EvaYes
Air-Gap Capable
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- EvaNo
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- AGIBOT A2 Ultracommercial
- Evaproduction pilot
IP Rating
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- EvaIP20
Commercial
Price (USD)
- AGIBOT A2 UltraContact for quote
- Eva$23,000 USD
Price Tier
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra500k_plus
- Eva40-80K
Pricing Model
- AGIBOT A2 Ultraoutright purchase
- Evapre-order
Warranty
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- Eva1 yrs
Applications
- AGIBOT A2 Ultramanufacturing_assembly
- Evamachine_tending, inspection, quality_control_checks, research
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Hong Kong |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2014 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $23,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 69 kg | 9.5 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 169 mm | 167 mm |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | No | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat indoor, uneven outdoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 2 kg | 0.6 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 40 | 83 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 15 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 6 | 10 |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | — | 60 cm |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | No | independent |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Orin 64G | NVIDIA Jetson Xavier AGX |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | Intel i7 |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | No | cloud only |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | false | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | No | — |
| Programming (values differ) | Smart OTA Upgrade | visual_block, code_python |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 3 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | vision human |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Smart OTA Upgrade | visual_block, code_python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Open API (values differ) | No | Yes |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | — | No |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | commercial | production pilot |
| IP Rating (values differ) | — | IP20 |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $23,000 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 500k_plus | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | outright purchase | pre-order |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | manufacturing_assembly | machine_tending, inspection, quality_control_checks, research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AGIBOT A2 Ultra | Eva |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $23,000 |
| Payback period | — | 5.5 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $227,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +987% |
AGIBOT A2 Ultra has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AGIBOT A2 Ultra and Eva?
AGIBOT A2 Ultra is made by Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. Eva is made by Hanson Robotics, based in HK.
How do AGIBOT A2 Ultra and Eva compare on the Robo Score?
AGIBOT A2 Ultra scores 65.3 on the Robo Score. Eva scores 66.5. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are AGIBOT A2 Ultra and Eva in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AGIBOT A2 Ultra and Eva?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs Eva compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.