AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 Plus
Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT A2 Ultra (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 Plus (X-Humanoid) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
AGIBOT A2 UltraCN
X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 PlusCN
Verified Deployments
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra0 Deployments
- X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 Plus0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- AGIBOT A2 UltraACTIVE
- X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 PlusACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 Plus1630 mm
Mobility Type
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrabipedal
- X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 Plus—
Humanoid Subtype
- AGIBOT A2 Ultrafull bipedal
- X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 Plus—
Walking Speed
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 Plus1.7 m/s
Terrain
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 Plusboth
Payload & Dexterity
Total DOF
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 Plus54
Compute & AI
Programming
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 Pluscode_ros, code_python
Software
SDK Languages
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 Pluscode_ros, code_python
ROS Support
- AGIBOT A2 Ultra—
- X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 PlusYes
Commercial
Applications
- AGIBOT A2 Ultramanufacturing_assembly
- X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 Plusresearch, hazardous_env
| AGIBOT A2 UltrahumanoidAgibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd. 16.0Trust Score | X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 PlushumanoidX-Humanoid 23.0Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 1630 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 1.7 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 54 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Programming (values differ) | — | code_ros, code_python |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | code_ros, code_python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | manufacturing_assembly | research, hazardous_env |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Price Range (USD), Battery / Shift Runtime, Weight, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload, Payload (Peak), Arm DOF, Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Onboard Compute, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Runtime, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
AGIBOT A2 Ultra vs X-Humanoid Tien Kung 2.0 Plus compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.