A2-W vs Ameca
Side-by-side comparison of A2-W (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and Ameca (Engineered Arts) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- A2-WChina
- AmecaUnited Kingdom
Year First Available
- A2-W2023
- Ameca2021
Verified Deployments
- A2-W0 Deployments
- Ameca0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- A2-W$145,000 USD
- Ameca$250,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- A2-W2 hrs
- Ameca5 hrs
Availability Status
- A2-WACTIVE
- AmecaACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- A2-W163 mm
- Ameca1870 mm
Weight
- A2-W69 kg
- Ameca62 kg
Mobility Type
- A2-Wwheeled
- Amecabipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- A2-Wwheeled humanoid
- Amecafull bipedal
Walking Speed
- A2-W1.9 m/s
- Ameca—
Stair Climbing
- A2-Wnone
- Ameca—
Terrain
- A2-Wflat_indoor
- Amecaindoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- A2-W5 kg
- Ameca2 kg
Total DOF
- A2-W22
- Ameca61
Arm DOF
- A2-W7
- Ameca5
Hand DOF
- A2-W17
- Ameca4
Bimanual Coordination
- A2-Wcoordinated planning
- Ameca—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- A2-W275 TOPS
- AmecaTritium robot OS
VLM Capable
- A2-WNo
- Ameca—
Foundation Models
- A2-Wfalse
- Ameca—
Imitation Learning
- A2-WNo
- Ameca—
Programming
- A2-Wcode_python, visual_block
- AmecaPython, C++, block‑based coding
Battery & Power
Runtime
- A2-W5 hrs
- Ameca5 hrs
Battery Capacity
- A2-W2 kWh
- Ameca—
Charging Time
- A2-W2 hrs
- Ameca—
Charging Method
- A2-Wmanual swap
- Ameca—
Battery Swap
- A2-WYes
- Ameca—
Safety
Human Detection Method
- A2-Wmulti modal
- Ameca—
Software
SDK Languages
- A2-Wcode_python, visual_block
- AmecaPython, C++, block‑based coding
ROS Support
- A2-WNo
- Ameca—
Open API
- A2-WNo
- Ameca—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- A2-Wcommercial
- Amecacommercial
Commercial
Price (USD)
- A2-W$145,000 USD
- Ameca$250,000 USD
Price Tier
- A2-W80-150K
- Ameca150K+
Pricing Model
- A2-Wpurchase
- Amecapurchase
Warranty
- A2-W2 yrs
- Ameca—
Applications
- A2-Wcustomer_service, manufacturing, logistics, healthcare
- Amecahuman-robot interaction research, public exhibitions, customer engagement, education
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United Kingdom |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2023 | 2021 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $145,000 USD | $250,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 2 hrs | 5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 163 mm | 1870 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 69 kg | 62 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | wheeled humanoid | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | 2 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 22 | 61 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 5 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 17 | 4 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | coordinated planning | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 275 TOPS | Tritium robot OS |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | No | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | false | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | No | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, visual_block | Python, C++, block‑based coding |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime | 5 hrs | 5 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 2 kWh | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | multi modal | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_python, visual_block | Python, C++, block‑based coding |
| ROS Support (values differ) | No | — |
| Open API (values differ) | No | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | commercial | commercial |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $145,000 USD | $250,000 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 80-150K | 150K+ |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | customer_service, manufacturing, logistics, healthcare | human-robot interaction research, public exhibitions, customer engagement, education |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, Teleoperation, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | A2-W | Ameca |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $145,000 | $250,000 |
| Payback period | 34.8 mo | 60.0 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $105,000 | $0 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +72% | +0% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes A2-W and Ameca?
A2-W is made by Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. Ameca is made by Engineered Arts, based in GB.
When were A2-W and Ameca launched?
A2-W launched in 2023. Ameca launched in 2021.
How much does A2-W cost compared to Ameca?
A2-W is listed at $145,000. Ameca is listed at $250,000.
How do A2-W and Ameca compare on the Robo Score?
A2-W scores 69.0 on the Robo Score. Ameca scores 61.3. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between A2-W and Ameca?
A2-W carries up to 15 kg. Ameca carries up to 2 kg.
Are A2-W and Ameca in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between A2-W and Ameca?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
A2-W vs Ameca compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.