Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT G2 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and Luna (LimX Dynamics Technology Co., Ltd) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Height


Weight


Mobility Type


Humanoid Subtype


Walking Speed


Running Capable


Stair Climbing


Terrain


Payload


Total DOF


Arm DOF


Hand DOF


Bimanual Coordination


Tool Use


Onboard Compute


Compute Platform


VLM Capable


Foundation Models


Imitation Learning


Teleoperation


Programming


Runtime


Charging Method


Battery Swap


Force-Limited Arms


Fall Recovery


Human Detection Method


Safe Speed Near Humans


SDK Languages


ROS Support


Simulation Platforms


Open API


Air-Gap Capable


Task Success Rate


Deployment Maturity


IP Rating


Price Tier


Pricing Model


Warranty


Production Pilots


Applications


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime | 4 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 175 mm | 160 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 55 kg | 54 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | wheeled | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | wheeled humanoid | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | 1.4 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | static walk | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | none | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor, rough_indoor | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | 3 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 26 | 27 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 5 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 12 | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | full bimanual | — |
| Tool Use (values differ) | production validated | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 500 TOPS | Dual RK3588 (motion + perception) |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Thor T5000 | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | onboard large | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | GO-1, WorkGPT, Genie | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | multi task | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | joystick, web_interface | — |
| Programming (values differ) | no_code_gui, code_python, teleoperation | AI task editor (natural language) |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime | 4 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | auto dock | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | multi modal | — |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | software_defined | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python | AI task editor (natural language) |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | Genie Sim 3.0 | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Task Success Rate (values differ) | 99 % | — |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | commercial |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP42 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex, pilot_fee | — |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | Automotive seatbelt lock cylinder assembly, Consumer electronics precision tasks | — |
| Applications (values differ) | assembly, inspection, hospitality, warehouse_transport | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, MTBF, Noise Level, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time
Frequently asked
AGIBOT G2 is made by Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. Luna is made by LimX Dynamics Technology Co., Ltd, based in CN.
AGIBOT G2 launched in 2025. Luna launched in 2026.
AGIBOT G2 grades AA on the Robo Index. Luna grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
AGIBOT G2 carries up to 5 kg. Luna carries up to 3 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
AGIBOT G2 vs Luna compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.