Side-by-side comparison of AGIBOT X1 (Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd.) and Optimus (Tesla) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Price Range (USD)

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Weight

Height

Mobility Type

Humanoid Subtype

Walking Speed

Running Capable

Stair Climbing

Terrain

Payload

Payload (Peak)

Total DOF

Arm DOF

Hand DOF

Grip Strength

Bimanual Coordination

Onboard Compute

Compute Platform

Foundation Models

Imitation Learning

Teleoperation

Programming

Runtime

Battery Capacity

Charging Method

Battery Swap

SDK Languages

ROS Support

Simulation Platforms

Open API

Air-Gap Capable

Deployment Maturity

IP Rating

Price (USD)

Price Tier

Pricing Model

Delivery Lead Time

Warranty

Applications

| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2022 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $30,000 | $25,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 2 hrs | 24 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 33.8 kg | 25.4 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 130 mm | 173 mm |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | 2.2 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | run capable |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | none |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat indoor, uneven outdoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 0.5 kg | 9 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 68 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 34 | 75 |
| Arm DOF | 7 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 17 | 22 |
| Grip Strength (values differ) | 30 N | — |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | full bimanual |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Xyber-Edge cerebellum controller, Xyber-DCU domain controller | Tesla AI5 chip |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson or x86 PC | Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD) computer |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | Grok |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | learn from watching videos |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | vr_headset | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, teleoperation | code_python, proprietary_app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 2.3 kWh |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, ROS2 | code_python, proprietary_app |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 community | ros2 vendor |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | Isaac Gym, MuJoCo | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | Yes |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | — | No |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | prototype | prototype |
| IP Rating (values differ) | — | IP68 FOREARM TO HANDS & FOOT |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $30,000 | $25,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 40-80K | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | capex |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | — | 2 mo |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Applications (values differ) | healthcare_assistance, education, service_industry | logistics, healthcare, domestic use |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Arm Reach, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
AGIBOT X1 is made by Agibot Innovation (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. Optimus is made by Tesla, based in US.
AGIBOT X1 launched in 2025. Optimus launched in 2022.
AGIBOT X1 is listed at $30,000. Optimus is listed at $25,000.
AGIBOT X1 scores 73/100. Optimus scores 100/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
AGIBOT X1 carries up to 15 kg. Optimus carries up to 68 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
AGIBOT X1 vs Optimus compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.