Side-by-side comparison of AIRGO XP (SUITX) and HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP (Cyberdyne) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Germany | Japan |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $5,740 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 2.2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload Capacity, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AIRGO XP | HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $5,740 | No price |
| Payback period | 1.4 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $244,260 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +4256% | — |
HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Frequently asked
AIRGO XP is made by SUITX, based in DE. HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP is made by Cyberdyne, based in JP.
AIRGO XP launched in 2025. HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP launched in 2015.
AIRGO XP grades BBB on the Robo Index. HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Exoskeleton on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Exoskeleton TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program
7 min readExoskeletons
The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags
8 min readExoskeletons
A 90-day deployment playbook for industrial exoskeleton programs
9 min readExoskeletons
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
AIRGO XP vs HAL®医療用単関節タイプ JP compares two robots in the exoskeleton category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.