AlphaBot 2 vs NEO
Side-by-side comparison of AlphaBot 2 (智平方科技) and NEO (1X Technologies AS) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
| AlphaBot 2humanoid智平方科技 41.0Trust Score |  NEOhumanoid1X Technologies AS61.8Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2026 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $20,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 6 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | — | 1676.4 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | — | 29.9 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | 通用智能机器人 | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 1.4 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | — | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 25 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | — | 52 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 22 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 1X NEO Cortex (Nvidia Jetson Thor) |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | 1X World Model |
| Programming (values differ) | — | voice, mobile app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 6 hrs | 4 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | voice, mobile app |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $20,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | <10K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | purchase |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 3 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | 物料协同转运, 智能拆包消毒, 智能视觉检验, 多物料协同智能供料 | cleaning, eldercare_assistance, hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
About this comparison
AlphaBot 2 vs NEO compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.