Ameca vs Eva
Side-by-side comparison of Ameca (Engineered Arts) and Eva (Hanson Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AmecaUnited Kingdom
- EvaHong Kong
Year First Available
- Ameca2021
- Eva2014
Verified Deployments
- Ameca0 Deployments
- Eva0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Ameca$250,000 USD
- Eva$23,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Ameca5 hrs
- Eva8 hrs
Availability Status
- AmecaACTIVE
- EvaACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- Ameca1870 mm
- Eva167 mm
Weight
- Ameca62 kg
- Eva9.5 kg
Mobility Type
- Amecabipedal
- Evabipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- Amecafull bipedal
- Evafull bipedal
Walking Speed
- Ameca—
- Eva1.5 m/s
Terrain
- Amecaindoor
- Evaboth
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- Ameca2 kg
- Eva0.6 kg
Total DOF
- Ameca61
- Eva83
Arm DOF
- Ameca5
- Eva15
Hand DOF
- Ameca4
- Eva10
Arm Reach
- Ameca—
- Eva60 cm
Bimanual Coordination
- Ameca—
- Evaindependent
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- AmecaTritium robot OS
- EvaNVIDIA Jetson Xavier AGX
Compute Platform
- Ameca—
- EvaIntel i7
VLM Capable
- Ameca—
- Evacloud only
Programming
- AmecaPython, C++, block‑based coding
- Evavisual_block, code_python
Battery & Power
Runtime
- Ameca5 hrs
- Eva8 hrs
Safety
Human Detection Method
- Ameca—
- Evavision human
Software
SDK Languages
- AmecaPython, C++, block‑based coding
- Evavisual_block, code_python
ROS Support
- Ameca—
- EvaYes
Open API
- Ameca—
- EvaYes
Air-Gap Capable
- Ameca—
- EvaNo
Reliability
IP Rating
- Ameca—
- EvaIP20
Deployment Maturity
- Amecacommercial
- Evaproduction pilot
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Ameca$250,000 USD
- Eva$23,000 USD
Price Tier
- Ameca150K+
- Eva40-80K
Pricing Model
- Amecapurchase
- Evapre-order
Warranty
- Ameca—
- Eva1 yrs
Applications
- Amecahuman-robot interaction research, public exhibitions, customer engagement, education
- Evamachine_tending, inspection, quality_control_checks, research
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United Kingdom | Hong Kong |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2021 | 2014 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $250,000 USD | $23,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 5 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1870 mm | 167 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 62 kg | 9.5 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 1.5 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 2 kg | 0.6 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 61 | 83 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 5 | 15 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 4 | 10 |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | — | 60 cm |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | independent |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Tritium robot OS | NVIDIA Jetson Xavier AGX |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | Intel i7 |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | cloud only |
| Programming (values differ) | Python, C++, block‑based coding | visual_block, code_python |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 5 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | vision human |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, block‑based coding | visual_block, code_python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | — | No |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | — | IP20 |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | commercial | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $250,000 USD | $23,000 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | pre-order |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
| Applications (values differ) | human-robot interaction research, public exhibitions, customer engagement, education | machine_tending, inspection, quality_control_checks, research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Ameca | Eva |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $250,000 | $23,000 |
| Payback period | 60.0 mo | 5.5 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $0 | $227,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +0% | +987% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Ameca and Eva?
Ameca is made by Engineered Arts, based in GB. Eva is made by Hanson Robotics, based in HK.
When were Ameca and Eva launched?
Ameca launched in 2021. Eva launched in 2014.
How much does Ameca cost compared to Eva?
Ameca is listed at $250,000. Eva is listed at $23,000.
How do Ameca and Eva compare on the Robo Score?
Ameca scores 61.3 on the Robo Score. Eva scores 66.5. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between Ameca and Eva?
Ameca carries up to 2 kg. Eva carries up to 1.25 kg.
Are Ameca and Eva in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Ameca and Eva?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Ameca vs Eva compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.