Ameca vs XBot-L
Side-by-side comparison of Ameca (Engineered Arts) and XBot-L (Robotera) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AmecaUnited Kingdom
- XBot-LChina
Year First Available
- Ameca2021
- XBot-L2023
Verified Deployments
- Ameca0 Deployments
- XBot-L0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Ameca$250,000 USD
- XBot-L$20,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Ameca5 hrs
- XBot-L2 hrs
Availability Status
- AmecaACTIVE
- XBot-LACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- Ameca1870 mm
- XBot-L131 mm
Weight
- Ameca62 kg
- XBot-L65 kg
Mobility Type
- Amecabipedal
- XBot-Lbipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- Amecafull bipedal
- XBot-Lfull bipedal
Walking Speed
- Ameca—
- XBot-L4 m/s
Stair Climbing
- Ameca—
- XBot-LNo
Terrain
- Amecaindoor
- XBot-Lflat indoor
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- Ameca2 kg
- XBot-L3 kg
Total DOF
- Ameca61
- XBot-L30
Arm DOF
- Ameca5
- XBot-L7
Hand DOF
- Ameca4
- XBot-L—
Arm Reach
- Ameca—
- XBot-L56 cm
Bimanual Coordination
- Ameca—
- XBot-LNo
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- AmecaTritium robot OS
- XBot-LRK3588 ×2
VLM Capable
- Ameca—
- XBot-LNo
Foundation Models
- Ameca—
- XBot-Lfalse
Imitation Learning
- Ameca—
- XBot-LNo
Programming
- AmecaPython, C++, block‑based coding
- XBot-LOpen-source
Battery & Power
Runtime
- Ameca5 hrs
- XBot-L2 hrs
Battery Swap
- Ameca—
- XBot-LYes
Software
SDK Languages
- AmecaPython, C++, block‑based coding
- XBot-LPython, C++
ROS Support
- Ameca—
- XBot-LNo
Open API
- Ameca—
- XBot-LYes
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- Amecacommercial
- XBot-Lcommercial
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Ameca$250,000 USD
- XBot-L$20,000 USD
Price Tier
- Ameca150K+
- XBot-L20-40K
Pricing Model
- Amecapurchase
- XBot-L—
Applications
- Amecahuman-robot interaction research, public exhibitions, customer engagement, education
- XBot-LDemonstrated walking on uneven terrain, climbing stairs, shadowboxing, tai chi, and waving; enhanced for unfamiliar terrains.[1][3][4][6]
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United Kingdom | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2021 | 2023 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $250,000 USD | $20,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 5 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1870 mm | 131 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 62 kg | 65 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 4 m/s |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | No |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 2 kg | 3 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 61 | 30 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 5 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 4 | — |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | — | 56 cm |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | No |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Tritium robot OS | RK3588 ×2 |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | No |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | false |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | No |
| Programming (values differ) | Python, C++, block‑based coding | Open-source |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 5 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, block‑based coding | Python, C++ |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | No |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | commercial | commercial |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $250,000 USD | $20,000 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Applications (values differ) | human-robot interaction research, public exhibitions, customer engagement, education | Demonstrated walking on uneven terrain, climbing stairs, shadowboxing, tai chi, and waving; enhanced for unfamiliar terrains.[1][3][4][6] |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Ameca | XBot-L |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $250,000 | $20,000 |
| Payback period | 60.0 mo | 4.8 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $0 | $230,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +0% | +1150% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Ameca and XBot-L?
Ameca is made by Engineered Arts, based in GB. XBot-L is made by Robotera, based in CN.
When were Ameca and XBot-L launched?
Ameca launched in 2021. XBot-L launched in 2023.
How much does Ameca cost compared to XBot-L?
Ameca is listed at $250,000. XBot-L is listed at $20,000.
How do Ameca and XBot-L compare on the Robo Score?
Ameca scores 61.3 on the Robo Score. XBot-L scores 61.4. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between Ameca and XBot-L?
Ameca carries up to 2 kg. XBot-L carries up to 20 kg.
Are Ameca and XBot-L in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Ameca and XBot-L?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Ameca vs XBot-L compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.