Ameca vs Walker S2
Side-by-side comparison of Ameca (Engineered Arts) and Walker S2 (UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AmecaUnited Kingdom
- Walker S2China
Year First Available
- Ameca2021
- Walker S22025
Verified Deployments
- Ameca0 Deployments
- Walker S20 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Ameca$250,000 USD
- Walker S2$99,995–$314,286 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Ameca5 hrs
- Walker S22 hrs
Availability Status
- AmecaACTIVE
- Walker S2ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- Ameca1870 mm
- Walker S2176 mm
Weight
- Ameca62 kg
- Walker S295 kg
Mobility Type
- Amecabipedal
- Walker S2bipedal
Humanoid Subtype
- Amecafull bipedal
- Walker S2full bipedal
Walking Speed
- Ameca—
- Walker S22 m/s
Stair Climbing
- Ameca—
- Walker S2Yes
Terrain
- Amecaindoor
- Walker S2flat indoor, stairs
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- Ameca2 kg
- Walker S252 kg
Total DOF
- Ameca61
- Walker S252
Arm DOF
- Ameca5
- Walker S27
Hand DOF
- Ameca4
- Walker S27
Bimanual Coordination
- Ameca—
- Walker S2Yes
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- AmecaTritium robot OS
- Walker S2X86 + NVIDIA Jetson Orin
VLM Capable
- Ameca—
- Walker S2No
Foundation Models
- Ameca—
- Walker S2false
Imitation Learning
- Ameca—
- Walker S2No
Programming
- AmecaPython, C++, block‑based coding
- Walker S2code_ros
Battery & Power
Runtime
- Ameca5 hrs
- Walker S22 hrs
Battery Swap
- Ameca—
- Walker S2Yes
Software
SDK Languages
- AmecaPython, C++, block‑based coding
- Walker S2Python
ROS Support
- Ameca—
- Walker S2Yes
Open API
- Ameca—
- Walker S2Yes
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- Amecacommercial
- Walker S2commercial
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Ameca$250,000 USD
- Walker S2$99,995–$314,286 USD
Price Tier
- Ameca150K+
- Walker S280-150K
Pricing Model
- Amecapurchase
- Walker S2purchase
Applications
- Amecahuman-robot interaction research, public exhibitions, customer engagement, education
- Walker S2industrial automation, 24/7 manufacturing
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United Kingdom | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2021 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $250,000 USD | $99,995–$314,286 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 5 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1870 mm | 176 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 62 kg | 95 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 2 m/s |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat indoor, stairs |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 2 kg | 52 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 61 | 52 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 5 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 4 | 7 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Tritium robot OS | X86 + NVIDIA Jetson Orin |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | No |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | false |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | No |
| Programming (values differ) | Python, C++, block‑based coding | code_ros |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 5 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, block‑based coding | Python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity | commercial | commercial |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $250,000 USD | $99,995–$314,286 USD |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | 80-150K |
| Pricing Model | purchase | purchase |
| Applications (values differ) | human-robot interaction research, public exhibitions, customer engagement, education | industrial automation, 24/7 manufacturing |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Compute Platform, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Ameca | Walker S2 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $250,000 | $207,140 |
| Payback period | 60.0 mo | 49.7 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $0 | $42,860 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +0% | +21% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Ameca and Walker S2?
Ameca is made by Engineered Arts, based in GB. Walker S2 is made by UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd., based in CN.
When were Ameca and Walker S2 launched?
Ameca launched in 2021. Walker S2 launched in 2025.
How do Ameca and Walker S2 compare on the Robo Index?
Ameca grades A on the Robo Index. Walker S2 grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between Ameca and Walker S2?
Ameca carries up to 2 kg. Walker S2 carries up to 15 kg.
Are Ameca and Walker S2 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Humanoid robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Ameca and Walker S2?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Ameca vs Walker S2 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.