Side-by-side comparison of Armar 3 (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) and Optimus (Tesla) — specs, pricing, Robolist Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Height


Weight


Mobility Type


Humanoid Subtype


Walking Speed


Running Capable


Stair Climbing


Terrain


Payload


Payload (Peak)


Total DOF


Arm DOF


Hand DOF


Bimanual Coordination


Onboard Compute


Compute Platform


Foundation Models


Imitation Learning


Programming


Runtime


Battery Capacity


Battery Swap


SDK Languages


ROS Support


Open API


Air-Gap Capable


IP Rating


Deployment Maturity


Price (USD)


Price Tier


Pricing Model


Delivery Lead Time


Applications


![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Germany | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2006 | 2022 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $108,000–$216,000 | $25,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 24 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1700 mm | 173 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 150 kg | 25.4 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | camera stabilization exosuit | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 2.2 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | — | run capable |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | none |
| Terrain (values differ) | research | flat indoor, uneven outdoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 9 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 68 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 63 | 75 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 8 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 4 | 22 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | full bimanual |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Four high-end PCs with Intel Core i7-6700 CPU, 32 GB RAM, 500GB SSD, plus one GeForce GTX 1080 GPU with 8 GB RAM | Tesla AI5 chip |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD) computer |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | Grok |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | learn from watching videos |
| Programming (values differ) | — | code_python, proprietary_app |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 2.3 kWh |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | No |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | code_python, proprietary_app |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | ros2 vendor |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | — | No |
| Reliability | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | — | IP68 FOREARM TO HANDS & FOOT |
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $108,000–$216,000 | $25,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 10-20K | 20-40K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | capex |
| Delivery Lead Time (values differ) | — | 2 mo |
| Applications (values differ) | assembly | logistics, healthcare, domestic use |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Teleoperation, Charging Time, Charging Method, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Warranty, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
Armar 3 is made by Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, based in DE. Optimus is made by Tesla, based in US.
Armar 3 launched in 2006. Optimus launched in 2022.
Armar 3 scores 67/100. Optimus scores 100/100. The Robolist Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Armar 3 vs Optimus compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Index is calculated.