Side-by-side comparison of Athlete (Noetix Robotics) and REEM-C (PAL Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Price Range (USD)

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Height

Weight

Mobility Type

Humanoid Subtype

Walking Speed

Running Capable

Stair Climbing

Terrain

Payload

Total DOF

Arm DOF

Hand DOF

Bimanual Coordination

Onboard Compute

Compute Platform

VLM Capable

Foundation Models

Imitation Learning

Programming

Runtime

Charging Method

Battery Swap

Avg Power Consumption

SDK Languages

ROS Support

Open API

Deployment Maturity

Price (USD)

Price Tier

Pricing Model

Applications

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Spain |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2013 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $13,000 | $300,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 2 hrs | 3 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 118 mm | 165 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 30 kg | 80 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | 0.7 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | run capable | — |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat indoor | flat indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 5 kg | 1 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 18 | 44 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 4 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 19 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | — | No |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 6 TOPS | Dual i7 computers |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Orin | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | No |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | — | false |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Programming (values differ) | visual_block, teleoperation | SDK |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 1 hrs | 3 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Avg Power Consumption (values differ) | 15 W | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++ | C++, Python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 community | Yes |
| Open API | Yes | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | research |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $13,000 | $300,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 10-20K | 150K+ |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | lease |
| Applications (values differ) | entertainment, research, companionship | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Tool Use, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
Athlete is made by Noetix Robotics, based in CN. REEM-C is made by PAL Robotics, based in ES.
Athlete launched in 2025. REEM-C launched in 2013.
Athlete is listed at $13,000. REEM-C is listed at $300,000.
Athlete scores 37/100. REEM-C scores 69/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Athlete carries up to 5 kg. REEM-C carries up to 1 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Athlete vs REEM-C compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.