AUBO-i20 vs RACER3
Side-by-side comparison of AUBO-i20 (AUBO Robotics) and RACER3 (Comau) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AUBO-i20China
- RACER3Italy
Year First Available
- AUBO-i202015
- RACER3—
Verified Deployments
- AUBO-i200 Deployments
- RACER30 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- AUBO-i20ACTIVE
- RACER3ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- AUBO-i2020 kg
- RACER33 kg
Max TCP Speed
- AUBO-i202.6 m/s
- RACER31.5 m/s
IP Rating
- AUBO-i20IP54
- RACER3IP54
Reach
- AUBO-i201,650 mm
- RACER31,436 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- AUBO-i206
- RACER36
Repeatability
- AUBO-i20±0.1 mm
- RACER3±0.05 mm
Robot Weight
- AUBO-i2063.7 kg
- RACER330 kg
Mounting Options
- AUBO-i20Any
- RACER3floor, table
Safety
Safety Rating
- AUBO-i20CE
- RACER3CE, ISO/TS 15066
Force/Torque Sensing
- AUBO-i20software only
- RACER3none
Duty Cycle
- AUBO-i2024 7 continuous
- RACER3—
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- AUBO-i20—
- RACER31 hrs
No-Code Capable
- AUBO-i20Yes
- RACER3—
Offline Programming
- AUBO-i20Yes
- RACER3—
Programming Interface
- AUBO-i20proprietary_app
- RACER3TP5
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- AUBO-i20iso 9283 compatible
- RACER3—
Wrist Power Supply
- AUBO-i2024V (0.8A), 0V/12V/24V
- RACER3—
Software & Connectivity
SDK Languages
- AUBO-i20Python, C++
- RACER3—
ROS Compatible
- AUBO-i20Yes
- RACER3Yes
Fieldbus Protocols
- AUBO-i20Ethernet, ModBus-RTU/TCP, Profinet (optional)
- RACER3EtherCAT, Modbus TCP
Digital Twin Support
- AUBO-i20Yes
- RACER3—
Commercial
Warranty
- AUBO-i203 yrs
- RACER3—
Lead Time
- AUBO-i20—
- RACER34 wks
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Italy |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 20 kg | 3 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 2.6 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
| IP Rating (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) | IP54 | IP54 |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,650 mm | 1,436 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | ±0.05 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 63.7 kg | 30 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | Any | floor, table |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE | CE, ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | software only | none |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | 24 7 continuous | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | — | 1 hrs |
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | proprietary_app | TP5 |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | iso 9283 compatible | — |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | 24V (0.8A), 0V/12V/24V | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++ | — |
| ROS Compatible | Yes | Yes |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | Ethernet, ModBus-RTU/TCP, Profinet (optional) | EtherCAT, Modbus TCP |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | — |
| Lead Time (values differ) | — | 4 wks |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AUBO-i20 | RACER3 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
AUBO-i20, RACER3 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AUBO-i20 and RACER3?
AUBO-i20 is made by AUBO Robotics, based in CN. RACER3 is made by Comau, based in IT.
How do AUBO-i20 and RACER3 compare on the Robo Index?
AUBO-i20 grades AA on the Robo Index. RACER3 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of AUBO-i20 compare to RACER3?
AUBO-i20 has a reach of 1650 mm. RACER3 has a reach of 600 mm.
Are AUBO-i20 and RACER3 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AUBO-i20 and RACER3?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AUBO-i20 vs RACER3 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.