AUBO-i20 vs EC64-19
Side-by-side comparison of AUBO-i20 (AUBO Robotics) and EC64-19 (Elite Robots) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AUBO-i20China

- EC64-19China

Year First Available
- AUBO-i202015

- EC64-192023

Verified Deployments
- AUBO-i200 Deployments

- EC64-190 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- AUBO-i20ACTIVE

- EC64-19ACTIVE

Arm Mechanics
Robot Weight
- AUBO-i2063.7 kg

- EC64-19—

Max TCP Speed
- AUBO-i202.6 m/s

- EC64-19—

Payload
- AUBO-i2020 kg

- EC64-19—

Reach
- AUBO-i201,650 mm

- EC64-19—

Degrees of Freedom
- AUBO-i206

- EC64-196

Repeatability
- AUBO-i20±0.1 mm

- EC64-19±0.1 mm

Mounting Options
- AUBO-i20Any

- EC64-19floor, wall, ceiling

IP Rating
- AUBO-i20IP54

- EC64-19—

Safety
Safety Rating
- AUBO-i20CE

- EC64-19ISO 10218, ISO 13849

Force/Torque Sensing
- AUBO-i20software only

- EC64-19software only

Duty Cycle
- AUBO-i2024 7 continuous

- EC64-1924 7 continuous

Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- AUBO-i20Yes

- EC64-19Yes

Offline Programming
- AUBO-i20Yes

- EC64-19—

Programming Interface
- AUBO-i20proprietary_app

- EC64-19teach_pendant, no_code_gui, code_python

End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- AUBO-i20iso 9283 compatible

- EC64-19—

Integrated F/T Sensor
- AUBO-i20—

- EC64-19Yes

Wrist Power Supply
- AUBO-i2024V (0.8A), 0V/12V/24V

- EC64-19—

Software & Connectivity
SDK Languages
- AUBO-i20Python, C++

- EC64-19Python

ROS Compatible
- AUBO-i20Yes

- EC64-19—

Fieldbus Protocols
- AUBO-i20Ethernet, ModBus-RTU/TCP, Profinet (optional)

- EC64-19—

Digital Twin Support
- AUBO-i20Yes

- EC64-19—

Reliability
MTBF
- AUBO-i20—

- EC64-19100,000 hrs

Commercial
Warranty
- AUBO-i203 yrs

- EC64-19—

![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | 2023 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Robot Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 63.7 kg | — |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 2.6 m/s | — |
| Payload (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 20 kg | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,650 mm | — |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability | ±0.1 mm | ±0.1 mm |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | Any | floor, wall, ceiling |
| IP Rating (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE | ISO 10218, ISO 13849 |
| Force/Torque Sensing | software only | software only |
| Duty Cycle | 24 7 continuous | 24 7 continuous |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | proprietary_app | teach_pendant, no_code_gui, code_python |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | iso 9283 compatible | — |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | 24V (0.8A), 0V/12V/24V | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++ | Python |
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | Ethernet, ModBus-RTU/TCP, Profinet (optional) | — |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| MTBF (values differ) | — | 100,000 hrs |
| Commercial | ||
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AUBO-i20 | EC64-19 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
AUBO-i20, EC64-19 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AUBO-i20 and EC64-19?
AUBO-i20 is made by AUBO Robotics, based in CN. EC64-19 is made by Elite Robots, based in CN.
When were AUBO-i20 and EC64-19 launched?
AUBO-i20 launched in 2015. EC64-19 launched in 2023.
How do AUBO-i20 and EC64-19 compare on the Robo Index?
AUBO-i20 grades AA on the Robo Index. EC64-19 grades B. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of AUBO-i20 compare to EC64-19?
AUBO-i20 has a reach of 1650 mm. EC64-19 has a reach of 1900 mm.
Are AUBO-i20 and EC64-19 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AUBO-i20 and EC64-19?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AUBO-i20 vs EC64-19 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.