AUBO-i20 vs iFM T1 - 接驳线
Side-by-side comparison of AUBO-i20 (AUBO Robotics) and iFM T1 - 接驳线 (DH Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AUBO-i20China
- iFM T1 - 接驳线China
Year First Available
- AUBO-i202015
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
Verified Deployments
- AUBO-i200 Deployments
- iFM T1 - 接驳线0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- AUBO-i20ACTIVE
- iFM T1 - 接驳线ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- AUBO-i2020 kg
- iFM T1 - 接驳线15 kg
Max TCP Speed
- AUBO-i202.6 m/s
- iFM T1 - 接驳线4 m/s
IP Rating
- AUBO-i20IP54
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
Reach
- AUBO-i201,650 mm
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
Degrees of Freedom
- AUBO-i206
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
Repeatability
- AUBO-i20±0.1 mm
- iFM T1 - 接驳线±10 mm
Robot Weight
- AUBO-i2063.7 kg
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
Mounting Options
- AUBO-i20Any
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
Safety
Safety Rating
- AUBO-i20CE
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
Force/Torque Sensing
- AUBO-i20software only
- iFM T1 - 接驳线none
Duty Cycle
- AUBO-i2024 7 continuous
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- AUBO-i20Yes
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
Offline Programming
- AUBO-i20Yes
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
Programming Interface
- AUBO-i20proprietary_app
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- AUBO-i20iso 9283 compatible
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
Wrist Power Supply
- AUBO-i2024V (0.8A), 0V/12V/24V
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
Software & Connectivity
SDK Languages
- AUBO-i20Python, C++
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
ROS Compatible
- AUBO-i20Yes
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
Fieldbus Protocols
- AUBO-i20Ethernet, ModBus-RTU/TCP, Profinet (optional)
- iFM T1 - 接驳线EtherCAT, TCP Modbus / TCP
Digital Twin Support
- AUBO-i20Yes
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
Commercial
Warranty
- AUBO-i203 yrs
- iFM T1 - 接驳线—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 20 kg | 15 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 2.6 m/s | 4 m/s |
| IP Rating (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,650 mm | — |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | ±10 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 63.7 kg | — |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | Any | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE | — |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | software only | none |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | 24 7 continuous | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | proprietary_app | — |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | iso 9283 compatible | — |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | 24V (0.8A), 0V/12V/24V | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++ | — |
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | Ethernet, ModBus-RTU/TCP, Profinet (optional) | EtherCAT, TCP Modbus / TCP |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Price (USD), CaaS / Month, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AUBO-i20 | iFM T1 - 接驳线 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
AUBO-i20, iFM T1 - 接驳线 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AUBO-i20 and iFM T1 - 接驳线?
AUBO-i20 is made by AUBO Robotics, based in CN. iFM T1 - 接驳线 is made by DH Robotics, based in CN.
How do AUBO-i20 and iFM T1 - 接驳线 compare on the Robo Index?
AUBO-i20 grades AA on the Robo Index. iFM T1 - 接驳线 grades BB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are AUBO-i20 and iFM T1 - 接驳线 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AUBO-i20 and iFM T1 - 接驳线?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AUBO-i20 vs iFM T1 - 接驳线 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.