AUBO-i20 vs LARA 3
Side-by-side comparison of AUBO-i20 (AUBO Robotics) and LARA 3 (NEURA Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AUBO-i20China
- LARA 3Germany
Year First Available
- AUBO-i202015
- LARA 3—
Verified Deployments
- AUBO-i200 Deployments
- LARA 30 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- AUBO-i20Contact for quote
- LARA 3$17,700–$47,300 USD
Availability Status
- AUBO-i20ACTIVE
- LARA 3ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- AUBO-i2020 kg
- LARA 314 kg
Max TCP Speed
- AUBO-i202.6 m/s
- LARA 3—
IP Rating
- AUBO-i20IP54
- LARA 3IP65
Reach
- AUBO-i201,650 mm
- LARA 31,400 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- AUBO-i206
- LARA 3—
Repeatability
- AUBO-i20±0.1 mm
- LARA 3±0.01 mm
Robot Weight
- AUBO-i2063.7 kg
- LARA 353 kg
Mounting Options
- AUBO-i20Any
- LARA 3all directions
Safety
Safety Rating
- AUBO-i20CE
- LARA 3PLd 3, SIL3
Force/Torque Sensing
- AUBO-i20software only
- LARA 3integrated wrist ft
Duty Cycle
- AUBO-i2024 7 continuous
- LARA 3—
Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- AUBO-i20Yes
- LARA 3Yes
Offline Programming
- AUBO-i20Yes
- LARA 3No
Programming Interface
- AUBO-i20proprietary_app
- LARA 3visual_block, no_code_gui, proprietary_app
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- AUBO-i20iso 9283 compatible
- LARA 3—
Wrist Power Supply
- AUBO-i2024V (0.8A), 0V/12V/24V
- LARA 3—
Software & Connectivity
SDK Languages
- AUBO-i20Python, C++
- LARA 3—
ROS Compatible
- AUBO-i20Yes
- LARA 3—
Fieldbus Protocols
- AUBO-i20Ethernet, ModBus-RTU/TCP, Profinet (optional)
- LARA 3EtherCAT, Modbus TCP
Digital Twin Support
- AUBO-i20Yes
- LARA 3—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- AUBO-i20Contact for quote
- LARA 3$17,700–$47,300 USD
CaaS / Month
- AUBO-i20—
- LARA 3$1,000
Warranty
- AUBO-i203 yrs
- LARA 3—
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $17,700–$47,300 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 20 kg | 14 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 2.6 m/s | — |
| IP Rating (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | IP54 | IP65 |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,650 mm | 1,400 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | ±0.01 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 63.7 kg | 53 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | Any | all directions |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | CE | PLd 3, SIL3 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | software only | integrated wrist ft |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | 24 7 continuous | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | proprietary_app | visual_block, no_code_gui, proprietary_app |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | iso 9283 compatible | — |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | 24V (0.8A), 0V/12V/24V | — |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++ | — |
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | Ethernet, ModBus-RTU/TCP, Profinet (optional) | EtherCAT, Modbus TCP |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $17,700–$47,300 USD |
| CaaS / Month (values differ) | — | $1,000 |
| Warranty (values differ) | 3 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AUBO-i20 | LARA 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $32,500 |
| Payback period | — | 7.8 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $217,500 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +669% |
AUBO-i20 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AUBO-i20 and LARA 3?
AUBO-i20 is made by AUBO Robotics, based in CN. LARA 3 is made by NEURA Robotics, based in DE.
How do AUBO-i20 and LARA 3 compare on the Robo Index?
AUBO-i20 grades AA on the Robo Index. LARA 3 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are AUBO-i20 and LARA 3 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AUBO-i20 and LARA 3?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AUBO-i20 vs LARA 3 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.