Aura vs FR3-C
Side-by-side comparison of Aura (Comau) and FR3-C (FAIRINO) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AuraItaly
- FR3-CChina
Year First Available
- Aura2016
- FR3-C—
Verified Deployments
- Aura0 Deployments
- FR3-C0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Aura$80,000 USD
- FR3-C$3,296–$6,799 USD
Availability Status
- AuraACTIVE
- FR3-CACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Reach
- Aura2,800 mm
- FR3-C622 mm
Repeatability
- Aura—
- FR3-C±0.02 mm
Payload
- Aura170 kg
- FR3-C5 kg
IP Rating
- Aura—
- FR3-CIP54
Degrees of Freedom
- Aura6
- FR3-C6
Max TCP Speed
- Aura—
- FR3-C1 m/s
Robot Weight
- Aura—
- FR3-C15 kg
Mounting Options
- Auraupside down
- FR3-Cany orientation
Safety
Safety Rating
- AuraISO/TS 15066
- FR3-CISO 9283
Force/Torque Sensing
- AuraYes
- FR3-Cnone
Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- Aura—
- FR3-CYes
Offline Programming
- Aura—
- FR3-CNo
Programming Interface
- Aurano_code_gui
- FR3-Cweb interface, drag-and-drop, Python, C#, C++
Software & Connectivity
ROS Compatible
- Aura—
- FR3-CNo
Fieldbus Protocols
- Aura—
- FR3-CModbus TCP, Profinet, Ethernet/IP, CC-Link
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Aura$80,000 USD
- FR3-C$3,296–$6,799 USD
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Italy | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $80,000 USD | $3,296–$6,799 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 2,800 mm | 622 mm |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | — | ±0.02 mm |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 170 kg | 5 kg |
| IP Rating (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | — | IP54 |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | — | 1 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 15 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | upside down | any orientation |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO/TS 15066 | ISO 9283 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | Yes | none |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | — | No |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | no_code_gui | web interface, drag-and-drop, Python, C#, C++ |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | — | No |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | — | Modbus TCP, Profinet, Ethernet/IP, CC-Link |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $80,000 USD | $3,296–$6,799 USD |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Aura | FR3-C |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $80,000 | $5,048 |
| Payback period | 19.2 mo | 1.2 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $170,000 | $244,953 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +213% | +4853% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Aura and FR3-C?
Aura is made by Comau, based in IT. FR3-C is made by FAIRINO, based in CN.
How do Aura and FR3-C compare on the Robo Index?
Aura grades AAA on the Robo Index. FR3-C grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of Aura compare to FR3-C?
Aura has a reach of 2800 mm. FR3-C has a reach of 622 mm.
Are Aura and FR3-C in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Aura and FR3-C?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Aura vs FR3-C compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.