Aura vs TX2-40
Side-by-side comparison of Aura (Comau) and TX2-40 (Stäubli International AG — Robotics Division) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AuraItaly
- TX2-40Switzerland
Year First Available
- Aura2016
- TX2-40—
Verified Deployments
- Aura0 Deployments
- TX2-400 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Aura$80,000 USD
- TX2-40Contact for quote
Availability Status
- AuraACTIVE
- TX2-40ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- Aura170 kg
- TX2-402 kg
Robot Weight
- Aura—
- TX2-4029 kg
Reach
- Aura2,800 mm
- TX2-40515 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- Aura6
- TX2-406
Repeatability
- Aura—
- TX2-40±0.02 mm
Mounting Options
- Auraupside down
- TX2-40—
IP Rating
- Aura—
- TX2-40IP65/IP67
Safety
Safety Rating
- AuraISO/TS 15066
- TX2-40SIL3-PLe
Force/Torque Sensing
- AuraYes
- TX2-40none
Ease of Use
Programming Interface
- Aurano_code_gui
- TX2-40VAL3
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Aura$80,000 USD
- TX2-40Contact for quote
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Italy | Switzerland |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $80,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 170 kg | 2 kg |
| Robot Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 29 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 2,800 mm | 515 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±0.02 mm |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | upside down | — |
| IP Rating (values differ) | — | IP65/IP67 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO/TS 15066 | SIL3-PLe |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | Yes | none |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | no_code_gui | VAL3 |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $80,000 USD | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Max TCP Speed, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Aura | TX2-40 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $80,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 19.2 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $170,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +213% | — |
TX2-40 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Aura and TX2-40?
Aura is made by Comau, based in IT. TX2-40 is made by Stäubli International AG — Robotics Division, based in CH.
How do Aura and TX2-40 compare on the Robo Index?
Aura grades AAA on the Robo Index. TX2-40 grades BBB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of Aura compare to TX2-40?
Aura has a reach of 2800 mm. TX2-40 has a reach of 515 mm.
Are Aura and TX2-40 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Aura and TX2-40?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Aura vs TX2-40 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.