Aura vs TM25S
Side-by-side comparison of Aura (Comau) and TM25S (Techman Robot Inc.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AuraItaly
- TM25STaiwan
Year First Available
- Aura2016
- TM25S2016
Verified Deployments
- Aura0 Deployments
- TM25S0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Aura$80,000 USD
- TM25SContact for quote
Availability Status
- AuraACTIVE
- TM25SACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- Aura170 kg
- TM25S25 kg
Robot Weight
- Aura—
- TM25S80 kg
Max TCP Speed
- Aura—
- TM25S5.2 m/s
Reach
- Aura2,800 mm
- TM25S1,902 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- Aura6
- TM25S6
Repeatability
- Aura—
- TM25S±0.03 mm
Mounting Options
- Auraupside down
- TM25S—
Safety
Safety Rating
- AuraISO/TS 15066
- TM25SISO 10218-1 Cat 3 PLd + UL + CSA + CE
Force/Torque Sensing
- AuraYes
- TM25Snone
Ease of Use
Programming Interface
- Aurano_code_gui
- TM25Sdrag_and_drop, code_python, code_ros, no_code_gui
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Aura$80,000 USD
- TM25SContact for quote
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Italy | Taiwan |
| Year First Available | 2016 | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $80,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 170 kg | 25 kg |
| Robot Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 80 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 5.2 m/s |
| Reach (values differ) | 2,800 mm | 1,902 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±0.03 mm |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | upside down | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO/TS 15066 | ISO 10218-1 Cat 3 PLd + UL + CSA + CE |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | Yes | none |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | no_code_gui | drag_and_drop, code_python, code_ros, no_code_gui |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $80,000 USD | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, IP Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Aura | TM25S |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $80,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 19.2 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $170,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +213% | — |
TM25S has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Aura and TM25S?
Aura is made by Comau, based in IT. TM25S is made by Techman Robot Inc., based in TW.
When were Aura and TM25S launched?
Aura launched in 2016. TM25S launched in 2016.
How do Aura and TM25S compare on the Robo Index?
Aura grades AAA on the Robo Index. TM25S grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of Aura compare to TM25S?
Aura has a reach of 2800 mm. TM25S has a reach of 1900 mm.
Are Aura and TM25S in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Aura and TM25S?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Aura vs TM25S compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.