Aura vs TQ-HPR40
Side-by-side comparison of Aura (Comau) and TQ-HPR40 (TQ-Group) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AuraItaly

- TQ-HPR40Germany
Year First Available
- Aura2016

- TQ-HPR402025
Verified Deployments
- Aura0 Deployments

- TQ-HPR400 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Aura$80,000 USD

- TQ-HPR40Contact for quote
Availability Status
- AuraACTIVE

- TQ-HPR40ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- Aura170 kg

- TQ-HPR40—
Reach
- Aura2,800 mm

- TQ-HPR40—
Degrees of Freedom
- Aura6

- TQ-HPR40—
Robot Weight
- Aura—

- TQ-HPR401.2 kg
Mounting Options
- Auraupside down

- TQ-HPR40down tube
Safety
Safety Rating
- AuraISO/TS 15066

- TQ-HPR40TÜV, UL
Force/Torque Sensing
- AuraYes

- TQ-HPR40—
Ease of Use
Programming Interface
- Aurano_code_gui

- TQ-HPR40—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- Aura$80,000 USD

- TQ-HPR40Contact for quote
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Italy | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2016 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $80,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 170 kg | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 2,800 mm | — |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 1.2 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | upside down | down tube |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO/TS 15066 | TÜV, UL |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Programming Interface (values differ) | no_code_gui | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $80,000 USD | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Repeatability, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, No-Code Capable, Offline Programming, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Fieldbus Protocols, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Aura | TQ-HPR40 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $80,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 19.2 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $170,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +213% | — |
TQ-HPR40 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Aura and TQ-HPR40?
Aura is made by Comau, based in IT. TQ-HPR40 is made by TQ-Group, based in DE.
When were Aura and TQ-HPR40 launched?
Aura launched in 2016. TQ-HPR40 launched in 2025.
How do Aura and TQ-HPR40 compare on the Robo Index?
Aura grades AAA on the Robo Index. TQ-HPR40 grades BBB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Aura and TQ-HPR40 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Aura and TQ-HPR40?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Aura vs TQ-HPR40 compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.