AM-150 vs MiR500
Side-by-side comparison of AM-150 (Aurotek Corporation) and MiR500 (MiR) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AM-150Taiwan

- MiR500Denmark

Year First Available
- AM-1502014

- MiR5002013

Verified Deployments
- AM-1500 Deployments

- MiR5000 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- AM-150—

- MiR50017.5 hrs

Availability Status
- AM-150ACTIVE

- MiR500ACTIVE

Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- AM-150150 kg

- MiR500500 kg

AMR Subtype
- AM-150unit load carrier

- MiR500unit load carrier

Length
- AM-150—

- MiR500800 mm

Width
- AM-150—

- MiR500580 mm

Min Aisle Width
- AM-150700 mm

- MiR500850 mm

Ground Clearance
- AM-150—

- MiR50025 mm

Robot Weight
- AM-15066 kg

- MiR50094 kg

Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- AM-150slam natural

- MiR500other

Localization Accuracy
- AM-150—

- MiR50060 mm

Docking Repeatability
- AM-150—

- MiR5003 mm

Obstacle Detection Range
- AM-150—

- MiR5001.2 m

Min Object Detection Height
- AM-150—

- MiR5009.8 cm

Pedestrian Detection
- AM-150—

- MiR500Yes

Battery
Battery Chemistry
- AM-150li fepo4

- MiR500li ion

Battery Capacity
- AM-1502.4 kWh

- MiR500—

Runtime (Loaded)
- AM-150—

- MiR50013 hrs

Opportunity Charging
- AM-150—

- MiR500Yes

Auto Docking
- AM-150—

- MiR500Yes

Charge Cycles (Rated)
- AM-150—

- MiR5003000

Safety
ISO 3691-4 Certified
- AM-150—

- MiR500Yes

R15.08 Certified
- AM-150—

- MiR500Yes

Emergency Stops
- AM-150—

- MiR5001

Safety LiDAR Coverage
- AM-150—

- MiR500360 °

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Taiwan | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | 2013 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 17.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 150 kg | 500 kg |
| AMR Subtype | unit load carrier | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | — | 800 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 580 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 700 mm | 850 mm |
| Ground Clearance (values differ) | — | 25 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 66 kg | 94 kg |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | slam natural | other |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | — | 60 mm |
| Docking Repeatability (values differ) | — | 3 mm |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | — | 1.2 m |
| Min Object Detection Height (values differ) | — | 9.8 cm |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li fepo4 | li ion |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 2.4 kWh | — |
| Runtime (Loaded) (values differ) | — | 13 hrs |
| Opportunity Charging (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Charge Cycles (Rated) (values differ) | — | 3000 |
| Safety | ||
| ISO 3691-4 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| R15.08 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | — | 1 |
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | — | 360 ° |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Turning Radius, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Charging Time, Battery Swap, Safety Category, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AM-150 | MiR500 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
AM-150, MiR500 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AM-150 and MiR500?
AM-150 is made by Aurotek Corporation, based in TW. MiR500 is made by MiR, based in DK.
When were AM-150 and MiR500 launched?
AM-150 launched in 2014. MiR500 launched in 2013.
How do AM-150 and MiR500 compare on the Robo Index?
AM-150 grades A on the Robo Index. MiR500 grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are AM-150 and MiR500 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AM-150 and MiR500?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AM-150 vs MiR500 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.