AUTOKOM vs MiR500
Side-by-side comparison of AUTOKOM (SCIO Automation) and MiR500 (MiR) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Home & Household buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- AUTOKOMGermany
- MiR500Denmark
Year First Available
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR5002018
Verified Deployments
- AUTOKOM0 Deployments
- MiR5000 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR50017.5 hrs
Availability Status
- AUTOKOMACTIVE
- MiR500ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR500500 kg
AMR Subtype
- AUTOKOMtugger
- MiR500unit load carrier
Length
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR500800 mm
Width
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR500580 mm
Min Aisle Width
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR500850 mm
Ground Clearance
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR50025 mm
Robot Weight
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR50094 kg
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR500other
Localization Accuracy
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR50060 mm
Docking Repeatability
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR5003 mm
Obstacle Detection Range
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR5001.2 m
Min Object Detection Height
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR5009.8 cm
Pedestrian Detection
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR500Yes
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR500li ion
Runtime (Loaded)
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR50013 hrs
Opportunity Charging
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR500Yes
Auto Docking
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR500Yes
Charge Cycles (Rated)
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR5003000
Safety
ISO 3691-4 Certified
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR500Yes
R15.08 Certified
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR500Yes
Emergency Stops
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR5001
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- AUTOKOM—
- MiR500360 °
Connectivity
API Type
- AUTOKOMopen rest
- MiR500—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Germany | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2018 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Home & Household buyers) (values differ) | — | 17.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 500 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | tugger | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | — | 800 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 580 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | — | 850 mm |
| Ground Clearance (values differ) | — | 25 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 94 kg |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | — | other |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | — | 60 mm |
| Docking Repeatability (values differ) | — | 3 mm |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | — | 1.2 m |
| Min Object Detection Height (values differ) | — | 9.8 cm |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | — | li ion |
| Runtime (Loaded) (values differ) | — | 13 hrs |
| Opportunity Charging (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Charge Cycles (Rated) (values differ) | — | 3000 |
| Safety | ||
| ISO 3691-4 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| R15.08 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | — | 1 |
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | — | 360 ° |
| Connectivity | ||
| API Type (values differ) | open rest | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Turning Radius, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Battery Swap, Safety Category, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | AUTOKOM | MiR500 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
AUTOKOM, MiR500 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes AUTOKOM and MiR500?
AUTOKOM is made by SCIO Automation, based in DE. MiR500 is made by MiR, based in DK.
How do AUTOKOM and MiR500 compare on the Robo Score?
AUTOKOM scores 50.1 on the Robo Score. MiR500 scores 73.1. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are AUTOKOM and MiR500 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between AUTOKOM and MiR500?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
AUTOKOM vs MiR500 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.