Side-by-side comparison of BD Rowa Vmax (BD Rowa) and HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02) (Cyberdyne) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country


Verified Deployments


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Germany | Japan |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 4.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Price, Payload Capacity, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | BD Rowa Vmax | HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02) |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
BD Rowa Vmax, HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02) have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Frequently asked
BD Rowa Vmax is made by BD Rowa, based in DE. HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02) is made by Cyberdyne, based in JP.
BD Rowa Vmax grades A on the Robo Index. HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02) grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Surgical Medical on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Surgical Medical TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Surgical Robot TCO: Capital, Consumables, Training, and Per-Procedure Cost.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Surgical Robot Vendor Selection: Support Coverage, Software Upgrades, and Lifecycle.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Surgical Robot TCO: Capital, Consumables, Training, and Per-Procedure Cost
8 min readSurgical & Medical Robots
Surgical Robot Vendor Selection: Support Coverage, Software Upgrades, and Lifecycle
9 min readSurgical & Medical Robots
Pilot to Scale: Case Volume Thresholds for Surgical Robot ROI
8 min readSurgical & Medical Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
BD Rowa Vmax vs HAL LUMBAR TYPE FOR WELL-BEING (FB02) compares two robots in the surgical-medical category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.