BLDC Φ35 vs KR 120 R3900-2 K
Side-by-side comparison of BLDC Φ35 (엠닉스) and KR 120 R3900-2 K (KUKA Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- BLDC Φ35—
- KR 120 R3900-2 KGermany
Year First Available
- BLDC Φ35—
- KR 120 R3900-2 K2015
Verified Deployments
- BLDC Φ350 Deployments
- KR 120 R3900-2 K0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- BLDC Φ35Contact for quote
- KR 120 R3900-2 K$19,000–$84,900 USD
Availability Status
- BLDC Φ35ACTIVE
- KR 120 R3900-2 KACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- BLDC Φ35—
- KR 120 R3900-2 K146 kg
Reach
- BLDC Φ35—
- KR 120 R3900-2 K3,904 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- BLDC Φ35—
- KR 120 R3900-2 K6
Repeatability
- BLDC Φ35—
- KR 120 R3900-2 K±0.04 mm
Robot Weight
- BLDC Φ351.3 kg
- KR 120 R3900-2 K42 kg
IP Rating (Arm)
- BLDC Φ35IP30
- KR 120 R3900-2 KIP65
IP Rating (Wrist)
- BLDC Φ35—
- KR 120 R3900-2 KIP67
Performance
Duty Cycle
- BLDC Φ35continuous 24 7
- KR 120 R3900-2 K—
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- BLDC Φ35—
- KR 120 R3900-2 KKR C5, KR C5 micro
End-Effector
Internal Cable Routing
- BLDC Φ35external only
- KR 120 R3900-2 K—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- BLDC Φ35Contact for quote
- KR 120 R3900-2 K$19,000–$84,900 USD
Warranty
- BLDC Φ351 yrs
- KR 120 R3900-2 K2 yrs
Service Network
- BLDC Φ35global
- KR 120 R3900-2 Kglobal
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $19,000–$84,900 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 146 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | — | 3,904 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±0.04 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 1.3 kg | 42 kg |
| IP Rating (Arm) (values differ) | IP30 | IP65 |
| IP Rating (Wrist) (values differ) | — | IP67 |
| Performance | ||
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | continuous 24 7 | — |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | — | KR C5, KR C5 micro |
| End-Effector | ||
| Internal Cable Routing (values differ) | external only | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $19,000–$84,900 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | 1 yrs | 2 yrs |
| Service Network | global | global |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Teach Pendant Type, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | BLDC Φ35 | KR 120 R3900-2 K |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $51,950 |
| Payback period | — | 12.5 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $198,050 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +381% |
BLDC Φ35 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes BLDC Φ35 and KR 120 R3900-2 K?
BLDC Φ35 is made by 엠닉스. KR 120 R3900-2 K is made by KUKA Robotics, based in DE.
How do BLDC Φ35 and KR 120 R3900-2 K compare on the Robo Score?
BLDC Φ35 scores 36.3 on the Robo Score. KR 120 R3900-2 K scores 78.0. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are BLDC Φ35 and KR 120 R3900-2 K in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between BLDC Φ35 and KR 120 R3900-2 K?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
BLDC Φ35 vs KR 120 R3900-2 K compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.