Skip to content

Bruno vs Kirobo

Side-by-side comparison of Bruno (Hajime Research Institute and TU Darmstadt) and Kirobo (Toyota) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

Prices in
View saved

Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.

Layer 1: Identity & Trust

Manufacturer Country

  • Bruno
  • Kirobo
    KiroboJapan

Year First Available

  • Bruno2010
  • Kirobo
    Kirobo2013

Verified Deployments

  • Bruno0 Deployments
  • Kirobo
    Kirobo0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational

Price

  • BrunoContact for quote
  • Kirobo
    Kirobo$393 USD

Battery / Shift Runtime

  • Bruno0.5 hrs
  • Kirobo
    Kirobo2.5 hrs

Availability Status

  • BrunoACTIVE
  • Kirobo
    KiroboACTIVE

Layer 3: Category Specific

Max Speed

  • Bruno0.4 m/s
  • Kirobo
    Kirobo

Autonomy Level

  • Brunofully autonomous
  • Kirobo
    Kirobo

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload Capacity, Reach, IP Rating

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

ROI Comparison

Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.

Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000

MetricBrunoKirobo
InvestmentNo price$393
Payback period< 1 mo
Net savings (5 yr)$249,607
ROI (5 yr)+63491%

Bruno has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.

Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.

Trade-offs at a glance

Frequently asked

Who makes Bruno and Kirobo?

Bruno is made by Hajime Research Institute and TU Darmstadt. Kirobo is made by Toyota, based in JP.

When were Bruno and Kirobo launched?

Bruno launched in 2010. Kirobo launched in 2013.

How do Bruno and Kirobo compare on the Robo Index?

Bruno grades B on the Robo Index. Kirobo grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.

Are Bruno and Kirobo in the same category?

Both robots are classified as Research on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.

What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Research robots?

Hardware cost is one input. Research TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: The real cost of a research platform.

What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Bruno and Kirobo?

Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The research-robot procurement RFP: questions and red flags.

Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.

Get updates:

Other comparisons

About this comparison

Bruno vs Kirobo compares two robots in the research category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.