CL-3 vs Tien Kung
Side-by-side comparison of CL-3 (Shenzhen LimX Dynamics Technology Co., Ltd.) and Tien Kung (X-Humanoid) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
CL-3CN
Tien KungCN
Year First Available
CL-32025
Tien Kung2025
Verified Deployments
CL-30 Deployments
Tien Kung0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
CL-3$40,000
Tien Kung$41,200
Battery / Shift Runtime
CL-32 hrs
Tien Kung3.5 hrs
Availability Status
CL-3ACTIVE
Tien KungACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Weight
CL-345 kg
Tien Kung73 kg
Height
CL-31650 mm
Tien Kung1700 mm
Humanoid Subtype
CL-3bipedal
Tien Kung—
Walking Speed
CL-31.1 m/s
Tien Kung3.3 m/s
Terrain
CL-3indoor
Tien Kungboth
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
CL-325 kg
Tien Kung6 kg
Total DOF
CL-350
Tien Kung20
Arm DOF
CL-37
Tien Kung7
Hand DOF
CL-35
Tien Kung6
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
CL-3Not specified
Tien KungNvidia Jetson Orin
Programming
CL-3code_python, sdk
Tien Kungvoice, app control
Battery & Power
Runtime
CL-32 hrs
Tien Kung3.5 hrs
Software
SDK Languages
CL-3code_python, sdk
Tien Kungvoice, app control
ROS Support
CL-3—
Tien KungYes
Open API
CL-3Yes
Tien KungYes
Commercial
Price (USD)
CL-3$40,000
Tien Kung$41,200
Price Tier
CL-340-80K
Tien Kung40-80K
Pricing Model
CL-3purchase
Tien Kung—
Applications
CL-3research, industrial applications
Tien Kungresearch, hazardous_env, industrial automation
CL-3humanoidShenzhen LimX Dynamics Technology Co., Ltd.40.9Trust Score | Tien KunghumanoidX-Humanoid43.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Year First Available | 2025 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $40,000 | $41,200 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 2 hrs | 3.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 45 kg | 73 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.1 m/s | 3.3 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | both |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 25 kg | 6 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 50 | 20 |
| Arm DOF | 7 | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 5 | 6 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Not specified | Nvidia Jetson Orin |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, sdk | voice, app control |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | 3.5 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_python, sdk | voice, app control |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Open API | Yes | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $40,000 | $41,200 |
| Price Tier | 40-80K | 40-80K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Applications (values differ) | research, industrial applications | research, hazardous_env, industrial automation |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Mobility Type, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Deployment Maturity, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
CL-3 vs Tien Kung compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.