Side-by-side comparison of CL801 (Coolight Technology Co., Ltd.) and GZM (Shanghai Guangzhi Automation Equipment Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country
Verified Deployments
Price Range (USD)
Availability Status
Cross-Category Comparison
Showing shared foundation fields. Select robots from the same category for full spec comparison.
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $173,000 | Contact for quote |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
Cross-Category Comparison Showing shared foundation fields. Select robots from the same category for full spec comparison. | ||
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Battery / Shift Runtime, Reach, Autonomy Level
Frequently asked
CL801 is made by Coolight Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. GZM is made by Shanghai Guangzhi Automation Equipment Co., Ltd..
CL801 scores 39/100. GZM scores 22/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
CL801 is categorized as Quadruped; GZM as Industrial Arm. The Product Score is calculated per category, so the absolute scores reflect their respective category tiers.
Hardware cost is one input. Quadruped And Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The quadruped vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The quadruped vendor RFP: questions and red flags
9 min readQuadruped Robots
A 90-day playbook to deploy autonomous inspection rounds
8 min readQuadruped Robots
Decision framework: matching quadruped to terrain and mission
7 min readQuadruped Robots
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
CL801 vs GZM compares two robots in the quadruped and industrial-arm categories. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.