天玑®骨科手术机器人 vs Ekso

Side-by-side comparison of 天玑®骨科手术机器人 (Tinavi Medical Technology) and Ekso (Ekso Bionics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

Prices in

View saved

Optimize comparison for buyer

Default Hospitality & F&B Warehousing & Logistics Manufacturing Healthcare & Hospitals Cleaning & Facilities Last-Mile Delivery Agriculture Home & Household

Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.

天玑®骨科手术机器人AA

EksoAA

Layer 1: Identity & Trust

Manufacturer Country

天玑®骨科手术机器人China
EksoUnited States

Year First Available

天玑®骨科手术机器人2016
Ekso2010

Verified Deployments

天玑®骨科手术机器人0 Deployments
Ekso0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational

Price

天玑®骨科手术机器人$2,100,000 USD
Ekso$130,000 USD

Availability Status

天玑®骨科手术机器人ACTIVE
EksoACTIVE

Layer 3: Category Specific

Max Speed

天玑®骨科手术机器人—
Ekso0.5 m/s

Autonomy Level

天玑®骨科手术机器人—
Eksofully autonomous

	天玑®骨科手术机器人surgical-medicalTinavi Medical Technology AARobo Index	Eksosurgical-medicalEkso Bionics AARobo Index
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country (values differ)	China	United States
Year First Available (values differ)	2016	2010
Verified Deployments	0 Deployments	0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price (values differ)	$2,100,000 USD	$130,000 USD
Availability Status	ACTIVE	ACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Max Speed (values differ)	—	0.5 m/s
Autonomy Level (values differ)	—	fully autonomous

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Payload Capacity, Reach, IP Rating

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

ROI Comparison

Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.

Robots (fleet)

Hours / day

Labor $/hr (USD)

Days / year

Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000

Metric	天玑®骨科手术机器人	Ekso
Investment	$2,100,000	$130,000
Payback period	504.0 mo	31.2 mo
Net savings (5 yr)	-$1,850,000	$120,000
ROI (5 yr)	-88%	+92%

Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.

Trade-offs at a glance

Frequently asked

Who makes 天玑®骨科手术机器人 and Ekso?

天玑®骨科手术机器人 is made by Tinavi Medical Technology, based in CN. Ekso is made by Ekso Bionics, based in US.

When were 天玑®骨科手术机器人 and Ekso launched?

天玑®骨科手术机器人 launched in 2016. Ekso launched in 2010.

How do 天玑®骨科手术机器人 and Ekso compare on the Robo Index?

天玑®骨科手术机器人 grades AA on the Robo Index. Ekso grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.

Are 天玑®骨科手术机器人 and Ekso in the same category?

Both robots are classified as Surgical Medical on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.

What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Surgical Medical robots?

Hardware cost is one input. Surgical Medical TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Surgical Robot TCO: Capital, Consumables, Training, and Per-Procedure Cost.

What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between 天玑®骨科手术机器人 and Ekso?

Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Surgical Robot Vendor Selection: Support Coverage, Software Upgrades, and Lifecycle.

Going deeper — picking the right robot

Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.

Other comparisons

About this comparison

天玑®骨科手术机器人 vs Ekso compares two robots in the surgical-medical category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.