Cobot ECR5 vs UR10e
Side-by-side comparison of Cobot ECR5 (EFORT Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.) and UR10e (Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne)) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Cobot ECR5China
- UR10eDenmark

Year First Available
- Cobot ECR5—
- UR10e2008

Verified Deployments
- Cobot ECR50 Deployments
- UR10e0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Cobot ECR5Contact for quote
- UR10e$44,636–$47,670 USD

Availability Status
- Cobot ECR5ACTIVE
- UR10eACTIVE

Arm Mechanics
Repeatability
- Cobot ECR5±0.03 mm
- UR10e±0.05 mm

IP Rating
- Cobot ECR5—
- UR10eIP54

Reach
- Cobot ECR51,291 mm
- UR10e1,300 mm

Payload
- Cobot ECR58 kg
- UR10e10 kg

Degrees of Freedom
- Cobot ECR56
- UR10e6

Max TCP Speed
- Cobot ECR5—
- UR10e1 m/s

Robot Weight
- Cobot ECR5—
- UR10e33.5 kg

Mounting Options
- Cobot ECR5floor-mounted, ceiling-mount, wall-mounted
- UR10efloor, ceiling, wall, rail

Safety
Safety Rating
- Cobot ECR5—
- UR10eCat3 PLd

Force/Torque Sensing
- Cobot ECR5none
- UR10ewrist external

Duty Cycle
- Cobot ECR5—
- UR10e24 7 continuous

Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- Cobot ECR5—
- UR10eYes

Offline Programming
- Cobot ECR5—
- UR10eYes

Programming Interface
- Cobot ECR5drag_and_drop
- UR10eteach_pendant, no_code_gui

End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- Cobot ECR5—
- UR10eiso 9283

Tool Changer Support
- Cobot ECR5—
- UR10eautomatic

Integrated F/T Sensor
- Cobot ECR5—
- UR10eYes

Wrist Power Supply
- Cobot ECR5—
- UR10e24V DC + 6 bar pneumatic

Software & Connectivity
SDK Languages
- Cobot ECR5—
- UR10ePython, C++, URScript, .NET

Fieldbus Protocols
- Cobot ECR5—
- UR10eMODBUS TCP, EtherNet/IP, Profinet

Digital Twin Support
- Cobot ECR5—
- UR10eYes

Commercial
Price (USD)
- Cobot ECR5Contact for quote
- UR10e$44,636–$47,670 USD

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2008 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $44,636–$47,670 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Repeatability (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | ±0.03 mm | ±0.05 mm |
| IP Rating (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | — | IP54 |
| Reach (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | 1,291 mm | 1,300 mm |
| Payload (values differ) | 8 kg | 10 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | — | 1 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 33.5 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor-mounted, ceiling-mount, wall-mounted | floor, ceiling, wall, rail |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | — | Cat3 PLd |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | none | wrist external |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | 24 7 continuous |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | drag_and_drop | teach_pendant, no_code_gui |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | iso 9283 |
| Tool Changer Support (values differ) | — | automatic |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | — | 24V DC + 6 bar pneumatic |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | Python, C++, URScript, .NET |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | — | MODBUS TCP, EtherNet/IP, Profinet |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $44,636–$47,670 USD |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, ROS Compatible, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Warranty, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Cobot ECR5 | UR10e |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $46,153 |
| Payback period | — | 11.1 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $203,847 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +442% |
Cobot ECR5 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Cobot ECR5 and UR10e?
Cobot ECR5 is made by EFORT Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd., based in CN. UR10e is made by Universal Robots A/S (subsidiary of Teradyne), based in DK.
How do Cobot ECR5 and UR10e compare on the Robo Score?
Cobot ECR5 scores 49.5 on the Robo Score. UR10e scores 75.9. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of Cobot ECR5 compare to UR10e?
Cobot ECR5 has a reach of 928 mm. UR10e has a reach of 1300 mm.
Are Cobot ECR5 and UR10e in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Cobot ECR5 and UR10e?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Cobot ECR5 vs UR10e compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.