COBOTTA PRO1300/900 vs YuMi
Side-by-side comparison of COBOTTA PRO1300/900 (DENSO Robotics) and YuMi (ABB) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900Japan
- YuMiSwitzerland

Year First Available
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900—
- YuMi2011

Verified Deployments
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900—
- YuMi1 Deployment

Layer 2: Operational
Price
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900Contact for quote
- YuMi$40,000–$51,000 USD

Availability Status
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900ACTIVE
- YuMiACTIVE

Arm Mechanics
Reach
- COBOTTA PRO1300/9001,300 mm
- YuMi560 mm

Repeatability
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900±0.04 mm
- YuMi±0.02 mm

Payload
- COBOTTA PRO1300/90012 kg
- YuMi0.5 kg

IP Rating
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900IP54
- YuMiIP30

Degrees of Freedom
- COBOTTA PRO1300/9006
- YuMi14

Max TCP Speed
- COBOTTA PRO1300/9002.5 m/s
- YuMi1.5 m/s

Robot Weight
- COBOTTA PRO1300/90041 kg
- YuMi38 kg

Mounting Options
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900floor, ceiling, wall, inverted
- YuMifloor

Safety
Safety Rating
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900ISO/TS 15066
- YuMiCat2 PLc

Force/Torque Sensing
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900none
- YuMinone

TCP Speed (Collaborative)
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900—
- YuMi1.5 m/s

Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900Yes
- YuMiYes

Offline Programming
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900No
- YuMiNo

Programming Interface
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900Blockly
- YuMiLead-Through Programming

End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900—
- YuMiiso 9283 compatible

Integrated F/T Sensor
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900—
- YuMiYes

Wrist Power Supply
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900—
- YuMi24V; 1A

Software & Connectivity
Fieldbus Protocols
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900—
- YuMiEthernet, Fieldbus

Digital Twin Support
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900—
- YuMiYes

Commercial
Price (USD)
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900Contact for quote
- YuMi$40,000–$51,000 USD

CaaS / Month
- COBOTTA PRO1300/900—
- YuMi$1,000

| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | Switzerland |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2011 |
| Verified Deployments (values differ) | — | 1 Deployment |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $40,000–$51,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 1,300 mm | 560 mm |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | ±0.04 mm | ±0.02 mm |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 12 kg | 0.5 kg |
| IP Rating (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | IP54 | IP30 |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | 14 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 2.5 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 41 kg | 38 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, ceiling, wall, inverted | floor |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO/TS 15066 | Cat2 PLc |
| Force/Torque Sensing | none | none |
| TCP Speed (Collaborative) (values differ) | — | 1.5 m/s |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming | No | No |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | Blockly | Lead-Through Programming |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | iso 9283 compatible |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | — | 24V; 1A |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | — | Ethernet, Fieldbus |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $40,000–$51,000 USD |
| CaaS / Month (values differ) | — | $1,000 |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, MTBF, Path Accuracy, Warranty, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | COBOTTA PRO1300/900 | YuMi |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $45,500 |
| Payback period | — | 10.9 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $204,500 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +449% |
COBOTTA PRO1300/900 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes COBOTTA PRO1300/900 and YuMi?
COBOTTA PRO1300/900 is made by DENSO Robotics, based in JP. YuMi is made by ABB, based in CH.
How do COBOTTA PRO1300/900 and YuMi compare on the Robo Score?
COBOTTA PRO1300/900 scores 59.3 on the Robo Score. YuMi scores 75.4. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of COBOTTA PRO1300/900 compare to YuMi?
COBOTTA PRO1300/900 has a reach of 1066 mm. YuMi has a reach of 559 mm.
Are COBOTTA PRO1300/900 and YuMi in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between COBOTTA PRO1300/900 and YuMi?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
COBOTTA PRO1300/900 vs YuMi compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.