MOTOMAN HC30PL vs YuMi
Side-by-side comparison of MOTOMAN HC30PL (Motoman) and YuMi (ABB) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MOTOMAN HC30PLJapan
- YuMiSwitzerland
Year First Available
- MOTOMAN HC30PL2019
- YuMi2011
Verified Deployments
- MOTOMAN HC30PL0 Deployments
- YuMi0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- MOTOMAN HC30PL$50,000–$70,000 USD
- YuMi$40,000–$51,000 USD
Availability Status
- MOTOMAN HC30PLACTIVE
- YuMiACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Reach
- MOTOMAN HC30PL1,300 mm
- YuMi560 mm
Repeatability
- MOTOMAN HC30PL±0.03 mm
- YuMi±0.02 mm
Payload
- MOTOMAN HC30PL5 kg
- YuMi0.5 kg
IP Rating
- MOTOMAN HC30PLIP54
- YuMiIP30
Degrees of Freedom
- MOTOMAN HC30PL6
- YuMi14
Max TCP Speed
- MOTOMAN HC30PL3.1 m/s
- YuMi1.5 m/s
Robot Weight
- MOTOMAN HC30PL140 kg
- YuMi38 kg
Mounting Options
- MOTOMAN HC30PLfloor, ceiling, wall
- YuMifloor
Safety
Safety Rating
- MOTOMAN HC30PLISO/TS 15066
- YuMiCat2 PLc
Force/Torque Sensing
- MOTOMAN HC30PLnone
- YuMinone
TCP Speed (Collaborative)
- MOTOMAN HC30PL—
- YuMi1.5 m/s
Ease of Use
Setup Time
- MOTOMAN HC30PL1 hrs
- YuMi—
No-Code Capable
- MOTOMAN HC30PLYes
- YuMiYes
Offline Programming
- MOTOMAN HC30PLYes
- YuMiNo
Programming Interface
- MOTOMAN HC30PLAUBO SDK
- YuMiLead-Through Programming
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- MOTOMAN HC30PLISO 9409-1-A50
- YuMiiso 9283 compatible
Integrated F/T Sensor
- MOTOMAN HC30PL—
- YuMiYes
Wrist Power Supply
- MOTOMAN HC30PL—
- YuMi24V; 1A
Software & Connectivity
ROS Compatible
- MOTOMAN HC30PLNo
- YuMi—
Fieldbus Protocols
- MOTOMAN HC30PLEtherCAT
- YuMiEthernet, Fieldbus
Digital Twin Support
- MOTOMAN HC30PL—
- YuMiYes
Commercial
Price (USD)
- MOTOMAN HC30PL$50,000–$70,000 USD
- YuMi$40,000–$51,000 USD
CaaS / Month
- MOTOMAN HC30PL—
- YuMi$1,000
Warranty
- MOTOMAN HC30PL2 yrs
- YuMi—
Lead Time
- MOTOMAN HC30PL4 wks
- YuMi—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | Switzerland |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2019 | 2011 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $50,000–$70,000 USD | $40,000–$51,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 1,300 mm | 560 mm |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | ±0.03 mm | ±0.02 mm |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 5 kg | 0.5 kg |
| IP Rating (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | IP54 | IP30 |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | 14 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 3.1 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 140 kg | 38 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, ceiling, wall | floor |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO/TS 15066 | Cat2 PLc |
| Force/Torque Sensing | none | none |
| TCP Speed (Collaborative) (values differ) | — | 1.5 m/s |
| Ease of Use | ||
| Setup Time (values differ) | 1 hrs | — |
| No-Code Capable | Yes | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | Yes | No |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | AUBO SDK | Lead-Through Programming |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | ISO 9409-1-A50 | iso 9283 compatible |
| Integrated F/T Sensor (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Wrist Power Supply (values differ) | — | 24V; 1A |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| ROS Compatible (values differ) | No | — |
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | EtherCAT | Ethernet, Fieldbus |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $50,000–$70,000 USD | $40,000–$51,000 USD |
| CaaS / Month (values differ) | — | $1,000 |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Lead Time (values differ) | 4 wks | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, SDK Languages, MTBF, Path Accuracy
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | MOTOMAN HC30PL | YuMi |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $60,000 | $45,500 |
| Payback period | 14.4 mo | 10.9 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $190,000 | $204,500 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +317% | +449% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes MOTOMAN HC30PL and YuMi?
MOTOMAN HC30PL is made by Motoman, based in JP. YuMi is made by ABB, based in CH.
When were MOTOMAN HC30PL and YuMi launched?
MOTOMAN HC30PL launched in 2019. YuMi launched in 2011.
How do MOTOMAN HC30PL and YuMi compare on the Robo Score?
MOTOMAN HC30PL scores 74.7 on the Robo Score. YuMi scores 75.4. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of MOTOMAN HC30PL compare to YuMi?
MOTOMAN HC30PL has a reach of 1700 mm. YuMi has a reach of 559 mm.
Are MOTOMAN HC30PL and YuMi in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between MOTOMAN HC30PL and YuMi?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
MOTOMAN HC30PL vs YuMi compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.