CW-GP vs HolaBot
Side-by-side comparison of CW-GP (Shanghai Chuangwang Industrial Co., Ltd) and HolaBot (Shenzhen Pudu Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- CW-GPChina

- HolaBotChina

Year First Available
- CW-GP—

- HolaBot2016

Verified Deployments
- CW-GP0 Deployments

- HolaBot0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- CW-GP12 hrs

- HolaBot—

Availability Status
- CW-GPACTIVE

- HolaBotACTIVE

Physical
Payload
- CW-GP—

- HolaBot60 kg

Tray Count
- CW-GP—

- HolaBot4

Compartment Type
- CW-GPopen trays

- HolaBotmixed

IP Rating
- CW-GP—

- HolaBotIPX5

Navigation & Safety
Navigation Type
- CW-GPlidar slam

- HolaBotother

Power
Battery Runtime
- CW-GP12 hrs

- HolaBot—

Auto Docking
- CW-GPYes

- HolaBot—

Integration
Fleet Management
- CW-GPsingle dashboard

- HolaBot—

Floor Compatibility
- CW-GPhard floor

- HolaBot—

Display & UX
Voice Interaction
- CW-GPYes

- HolaBot—

Languages Supported
- CW-GPChinese

- HolaBot—

![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 12 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical | ||
| Payload (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | — | 60 kg |
| Tray Count (values differ) | — | 4 |
| Compartment Type (values differ) | open trays | mixed |
| IP Rating (values differ) | — | IPX5 |
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam | other |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 12 hrs | — |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Integration | ||
| Fleet Management (values differ) | single dashboard | — |
| Floor Compatibility (values differ) | hard floor | — |
| Display & UX | ||
| Voice Interaction (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Languages Supported (values differ) | Chinese | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Robot Weight, Dimensions, Max Speed, Min Passable Width, Charge Time, Hot-Swap Battery, Elevator API, PMS / POS Integration, Display Size, Noise Level, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Warranty
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | CW-GP | HolaBot |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
CW-GP, HolaBot have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes CW-GP and HolaBot?
CW-GP is made by Shanghai Chuangwang Industrial Co., Ltd, based in CN. HolaBot is made by Shenzhen Pudu Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN.
How do CW-GP and HolaBot compare on the Robo Score?
CW-GP scores 49.6 on the Robo Score. HolaBot scores 64.7. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are CW-GP and HolaBot in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Hospitality Service on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Hospitality Service robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Hospitality Service TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between CW-GP and HolaBot?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care
9 min readService Robots
Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags
10 min readService Robots
Service Robot Pilot: A 60-Day Evaluation Framework
10 min readService Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
CW-GP vs HolaBot compares two robots in the hospitality-service category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.