Skip to content

da Vinci Xi vs HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT TYPE

Side-by-side comparison of da Vinci Xi (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.) and HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT TYPE (Cyberdyne) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

Prices in
View saved

Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.

Layer 1: Identity & Trust

Manufacturer Country

  • da Vinci Xi
    da Vinci XiUnited States
  • HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT TYPE
    HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT…Japan

Year First Available

  • da Vinci Xi
    da Vinci Xi2014
  • HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT TYPE
    HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT…

Verified Deployments

  • da Vinci Xi
    da Vinci Xi0 Deployments
  • HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT TYPE
    HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT…0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational

Price

  • da Vinci Xi
    da Vinci Xi$1,500,000–$2,500,000 USD
  • HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT TYPE
    HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT…Contact for quote

Battery / Shift Runtime

  • da Vinci Xi
    da Vinci Xi
  • HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT TYPE
    HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT…1 hrs

Availability Status

  • da Vinci Xi
    da Vinci XiACTIVE
  • HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT TYPE
    HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT…ACTIVE

Layer 3: Category Specific

Payload Capacity

  • da Vinci Xi
    da Vinci Xi
  • HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT TYPE
    HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT…100 kg

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

ROI Comparison

Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.

Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000

Metricda Vinci XiHAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT…
Investment$2,000,000No price
Payback period480.0 mo
Net savings (5 yr)-$1,750,000
ROI (5 yr)-88%

HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT… has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.

Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.

Trade-offs at a glance

Frequently asked

Who makes da Vinci Xi and HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT TYPE?

da Vinci Xi is made by Intuitive Surgical, Inc., based in US. HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT TYPE is made by Cyberdyne, based in JP.

How do da Vinci Xi and HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT TYPE compare on the Robo Index?

da Vinci Xi grades AA on the Robo Index. HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT TYPE grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.

Are da Vinci Xi and HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT TYPE in the same category?

Both robots are classified as Surgical Medical on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.

What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Surgical Medical robots?

Hardware cost is one input. Surgical Medical TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Surgical Robot TCO: Capital, Consumables, Training, and Per-Procedure Cost.

What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between da Vinci Xi and HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT TYPE?

Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Surgical Robot Vendor Selection: Support Coverage, Software Upgrades, and Lifecycle.

Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.

Get updates:

Other comparisons

About this comparison

da Vinci Xi vs HAL FOR MEDICAL USE SINGLE JOINT TYPE compares two robots in the surgical-medical category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.