Denso Cobotta PRO 900 vs MiniCobo
Side-by-side comparison of Denso Cobotta PRO 900 (DENSO) and MiniCobo (Jaka) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Denso Cobotta PRO 900Japan

- MiniCoboChina

Year First Available
- Denso Cobotta PRO 900—

- MiniCobo2014

Verified Deployments
- Denso Cobotta PRO 9000 Deployments

- MiniCobo0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Denso Cobotta PRO 900$15,000–$16,500 USD

- MiniCobo$13,313 USD

Availability Status
- Denso Cobotta PRO 900ACTIVE

- MiniCoboACTIVE

Arm Mechanics
Payload
- Denso Cobotta PRO 9009 kg

- MiniCobo1 kg

Max TCP Speed
- Denso Cobotta PRO 9002.5 m/s

- MiniCobo1.5 m/s

Reach
- Denso Cobotta PRO 9001,066 mm

- MiniCobo580 mm

Degrees of Freedom
- Denso Cobotta PRO 9006

- MiniCobo6

Repeatability
- Denso Cobotta PRO 900±0.04 mm

- MiniCobo±0.1 mm

Robot Weight
- Denso Cobotta PRO 90032 kg

- MiniCobo9.4 kg

Mounting Options
- Denso Cobotta PRO 900floor, wall, hanging

- MiniCobofloor, ceiling, wall

IP Rating
- Denso Cobotta PRO 900IP54

- MiniCoboIP54

Safety
Safety Rating
- Denso Cobotta PRO 900ISO 10218-1:2011, ISO 13849-1:2015, ISO/TS 15066:2016, IEC 60204-1:2016/A1:2021, EN 61000-6-7:2015

- MiniCoboISO/TS 15066

Force/Torque Sensing
- Denso Cobotta PRO 900Yes

- MiniCobonone

Ease of Use
No-Code Capable
- Denso Cobotta PRO 900—

- MiniCoboYes

Offline Programming
- Denso Cobotta PRO 900—

- MiniCoboNo

Programming Interface
- Denso Cobotta PRO 900teach_pendant, drag_and_drop

- MiniCoboGraphic Programming

End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- Denso Cobotta PRO 900—

- MiniCoboISO 9409-1-A50

Software & Connectivity
Fieldbus Protocols
- Denso Cobotta PRO 900—

- MiniCoboEtherCAT, Profinet

Commercial
Price (USD)
- Denso Cobotta PRO 900$15,000–$16,500 USD

- MiniCobo$13,313 USD

Warranty
- Denso Cobotta PRO 900—

- MiniCobo2 yrs

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2014 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $15,000–$16,500 USD | $13,313 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 9 kg | 1 kg |
| Max TCP Speed (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 2.5 m/s | 1.5 m/s |
| Reach (values differ) | 1,066 mm | 580 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.04 mm | ±0.1 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 32 kg | 9.4 kg |
| Mounting Options (values differ) | floor, wall, hanging | floor, ceiling, wall |
| IP Rating | IP54 | IP54 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Rating (values differ) | ISO 10218-1:2011, ISO 13849-1:2015, ISO/TS 15066:2016, IEC 60204-1:2016/A1:2021, EN 61000-6-7:2015 | ISO/TS 15066 |
| Force/Torque Sensing (values differ) | Yes | none |
| Ease of Use | ||
| No-Code Capable (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | — | No |
| Programming Interface (values differ) | teach_pendant, drag_and_drop | Graphic Programming |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | ISO 9409-1-A50 |
| Software & Connectivity | ||
| Fieldbus Protocols (values differ) | — | EtherCAT, Profinet |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $15,000–$16,500 USD | $13,313 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 2 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, TCP Speed (Collaborative), Power/Force Limiting, Safety I/O Pairs, Duty Cycle, Setup Time, Time to Redeploy, Tool Changer Support, Integrated F/T Sensor, Wrist Power Supply, SDK Languages, ROS Compatible, Digital Twin Support, MTBF, Path Accuracy, CaaS / Month, Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Denso Cobotta PRO 900 | MiniCobo |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $15,750 | $13,313 |
| Payback period | 3.8 mo | 3.2 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $234,250 | $236,688 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +1487% | +1778% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Denso Cobotta PRO 900 and MiniCobo?
Denso Cobotta PRO 900 is made by DENSO, based in JP. MiniCobo is made by Jaka, based in CN.
How do Denso Cobotta PRO 900 and MiniCobo compare on the Robo Index?
Denso Cobotta PRO 900 grades A on the Robo Index. MiniCobo grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of Denso Cobotta PRO 900 compare to MiniCobo?
Denso Cobotta PRO 900 has a reach of 1066 mm. MiniCobo has a reach of 580 mm.
Are Denso Cobotta PRO 900 and MiniCobo in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cobot on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cobot robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cobot TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Denso Cobotta PRO 900 and MiniCobo?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cobot TCO and Payback Math: Hardware, EOAT, and Zero-Fencing Savings
6 min readCollaborative Robots
Cobot Vendor Red Flags: Questions That Filter Out the Marketing
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Running a Cobot Pilot in a Manual Production Line
9 min readCollaborative Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Denso Cobotta PRO 900 vs MiniCobo compares two robots in the cobot category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.