Side-by-side comparison of DINERBOT T3 (Shanghai Keenon Robotics Co., Ltd.) and XIAOAO Robot-18 (Guangzhou Aobo Information Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Verified Deployments

Price Range (USD)

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Payload

Tray Count

Compartment Type

Navigation Type

Battery Runtime

Price (USD)

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $9,500–$22,500 USD | $8,000–$11,888 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 6 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 40 kg | — |
| Tray Count (values differ) | 3 | — |
| Compartment Type (values differ) | closed drawer | — |
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | other | lidar slam |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 6 hrs |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $9,500–$22,500 USD | $8,000–$11,888 USD |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Robot Weight, Dimensions, IP Rating, Max Speed, Min Passable Width, Charge Time, Auto Docking, Hot-Swap Battery, Elevator API, PMS / POS Integration, Fleet Management, Floor Compatibility, Display Size, Voice Interaction, Noise Level, Languages Supported, RaaS / Month, Warranty
Frequently asked
DINERBOT T3 is made by Shanghai Keenon Robotics Co., Ltd., based in CN. XIAOAO Robot-18 is made by Guangzhou Aobo Information Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN.
DINERBOT T3 scores 69/100. XIAOAO Robot-18 scores 58/100. The Robo Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Hospitality Service on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Hospitality Service TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care
9 min readService Robots
Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags
10 min readService Robots
Service Robot Pilot: A 60-Day Evaluation Framework
10 min readService Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
DINERBOT T3 vs XIAOAO Robot-18 compares two robots in the hospitality-service category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.