ECR5-900 vs Paloma
Side-by-side comparison of ECR5-900 (EFORT Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.) and Paloma (Demaurex) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- ECR5-900China
- Paloma—
Year First Available
- ECR5-9002019
- Paloma2014
Verified Deployments
- ECR5-9000 Deployments
- Paloma0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- ECR5-900$2,999–$3,999 USD
- Paloma$15,200 USD
Availability Status
- ECR5-900ACTIVE
- PalomaACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Reach
- ECR5-900928 mm
- Paloma—
Repeatability
- ECR5-900±0.03 mm
- Paloma—
Payload
- ECR5-9005 kg
- Paloma3 kg
IP Rating (Arm)
- ECR5-900IP54
- PalomaIP54
Degrees of Freedom
- ECR5-9006
- Paloma—
Robot Weight
- ECR5-90020.5 kg
- Paloma8.5 kg
Performance
Duty Cycle
- ECR5-900continuous 24 7
- Paloma—
Safety
Safe Zone Count
- ECR5-9008
- Paloma—
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- ECR5-900M-Cabinet, S-Cabinet, C-Cabinet, Explosion Protection - Cabinet, Collaborate - Cabinet
- PalomaGemini 4.0
Programming Languages
- ECR5-900RPL
- Paloma—
Teach Pendant Type
- ECR5-900wired touch
- Paloma—
Connectivity
ROS-Industrial Support
- ECR5-900vendor supported
- Paloma—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- ECR5-900$2,999–$3,999 USD
- Paloma$15,200 USD
Service Network
- ECR5-900regional
- Palomaregional
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2019 | 2014 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $2,999–$3,999 USD | $15,200 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 928 mm | — |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | ±0.03 mm | — |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 5 kg | 3 kg |
| IP Rating (Arm) (priority for Manufacturing buyers) | IP54 | IP54 |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 6 | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 20.5 kg | 8.5 kg |
| Performance | ||
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | continuous 24 7 | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safe Zone Count (values differ) | 8 | — |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | M-Cabinet, S-Cabinet, C-Cabinet, Explosion Protection - Cabinet, Collaborate - Cabinet | Gemini 4.0 |
| Programming Languages (values differ) | RPL | — |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | wired touch | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| ROS-Industrial Support (values differ) | vendor supported | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $2,999–$3,999 USD | $15,200 USD |
| Service Network | regional | regional |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | ECR5-900 | Paloma |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $3,499 | $15,200 |
| Payback period | < 1 mo | 3.6 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $246,501 | $234,800 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +7045% | +1545% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes ECR5-900 and Paloma?
ECR5-900 is made by EFORT Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd., based in CN. Paloma is made by Demaurex.
When were ECR5-900 and Paloma launched?
ECR5-900 launched in 2019. Paloma launched in 2014.
How do ECR5-900 and Paloma compare on the Robo Index?
ECR5-900 grades AA on the Robo Index. Paloma grades AAA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are ECR5-900 and Paloma in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between ECR5-900 and Paloma?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
ECR5-900 vs Paloma compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.