EffiBOT vs Mōryō
Side-by-side comparison of EffiBOT (Effidence) and Mōryō (Slip Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- EffiBOTFrance
- Mōryō—
Year First Available
- EffiBOT2015
- Mōryō—
Verified Deployments
- EffiBOT0 Deployments
- Mōryō0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- EffiBOT8 hrs
- Mōryō10 hrs
Availability Status
- EffiBOTACTIVE
- MōryōACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- EffiBOT500 kg
- Mōryō5,443 kg
AMR Subtype
- EffiBOTunit load carrier
- Mōryōpallet mover
Length
- EffiBOT1,450 mm
- Mōryō700 mm
Width
- EffiBOT660 mm
- Mōryō590 mm
Turning Radius
- EffiBOT1,200 mm
- Mōryō0 mm
Min Aisle Width
- EffiBOT3,300 mm
- Mōryō—
Robot Weight
- EffiBOT140 kg
- Mōryō—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- EffiBOTslam natural
- Mōryōlidar slam,vision
Pedestrian Detection
- EffiBOTYes
- MōryōYes
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- EffiBOTli ion
- Mōryōli ion nmc
Battery Capacity
- EffiBOT1.6 kWh
- Mōryō—
Charging Time
- EffiBOT3.5 hrs
- Mōryō—
Opportunity Charging
- EffiBOT—
- MōryōYes
Auto Docking
- EffiBOT—
- MōryōYes
Battery Swap
- EffiBOT—
- MōryōYes
Safety
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- EffiBOT360 °
- Mōryō—
Connectivity
API Type
- EffiBOT—
- Mōryōclosed
OTA Updates
- EffiBOT—
- MōryōYes
Reliability
MTBF
- EffiBOT—
- Mōryō10,000 hrs
Predictive Maintenance
- EffiBOT—
- MōryōYes
Commercial
Pricing Models
- EffiBOT—
- Mōryōraas
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | France | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | 10 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 500 kg | 5,443 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | unit load carrier | pallet mover |
| Length (values differ) | 1,450 mm | 700 mm |
| Width (values differ) | 660 mm | 590 mm |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | 1,200 mm | 0 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 3,300 mm | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 140 kg | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | slam natural | lidar slam,vision |
| Pedestrian Detection | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion | li ion nmc |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 1.6 kWh | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 3.5 hrs | — |
| Opportunity Charging (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | 360 ° | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| API Type (values differ) | — | closed |
| OTA Updates (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| MTBF (values differ) | — | 10,000 hrs |
| Predictive Maintenance (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Pricing Models (values differ) | — | raas |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Ground Clearance, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Runtime (Loaded), Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, Cybersecurity Certs, Uptime SLA, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | EffiBOT | Mōryō |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
EffiBOT, Mōryō have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes EffiBOT and Mōryō?
EffiBOT is made by Effidence, based in FR. Mōryō is made by Slip Robotics.
How do EffiBOT and Mōryō compare on the Robo Score?
EffiBOT scores 72.0 on the Robo Score. Mōryō scores 49.4. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are EffiBOT and Mōryō in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between EffiBOT and Mōryō?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
EffiBOT vs Mōryō compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.