EffiBOT vs Sereact Robotic Putwall
Side-by-side comparison of EffiBOT (Effidence) and Sereact Robotic Putwall (Sereact) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- EffiBOTFrance
- Sereact Robotic PutwallGermany
Year First Available
- EffiBOT2015
- Sereact Robotic Putwall—
Verified Deployments
- EffiBOT0 Deployments
- Sereact Robotic Putwall0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- EffiBOT8 hrs
- Sereact Robotic Putwall—
Availability Status
- EffiBOTACTIVE
- Sereact Robotic PutwallACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- EffiBOT500 kg
- Sereact Robotic Putwall—
AMR Subtype
- EffiBOTunit load carrier
- Sereact Robotic Putwall—
Length
- EffiBOT1,450 mm
- Sereact Robotic Putwall—
Width
- EffiBOT660 mm
- Sereact Robotic Putwall—
Turning Radius
- EffiBOT1,200 mm
- Sereact Robotic Putwall—
Min Aisle Width
- EffiBOT3,300 mm
- Sereact Robotic Putwall—
Robot Weight
- EffiBOT140 kg
- Sereact Robotic Putwall—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- EffiBOTslam natural
- Sereact Robotic Putwalllidar slam,vision
Pedestrian Detection
- EffiBOTYes
- Sereact Robotic Putwall—
Performance
Picks / Hour / Robot
- EffiBOT—
- Sereact Robotic Putwall450
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- EffiBOTli ion
- Sereact Robotic Putwall—
Battery Capacity
- EffiBOT1.6 kWh
- Sereact Robotic Putwall—
Charging Time
- EffiBOT3.5 hrs
- Sereact Robotic Putwall—
Safety
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- EffiBOT360 °
- Sereact Robotic Putwall—
Connectivity
Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt
- EffiBOT—
- Sereact Robotic PutwallYes
Reliability
Uptime SLA
- EffiBOT—
- Sereact Robotic Putwall99.9 %
Commercial
Pricing Models
- EffiBOT—
- Sereact Robotic Putwallraas
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | France | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 500 kg | — |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | unit load carrier | — |
| Length (values differ) | 1,450 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 660 mm | — |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | 1,200 mm | — |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 3,300 mm | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 140 kg | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | slam natural | lidar slam,vision |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Picks / Hour / Robot (values differ) | — | 450 |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion | — |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 1.6 kWh | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 3.5 hrs | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | 360 ° | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Uptime SLA (values differ) | — | 99.9 % |
| Commercial | ||
| Pricing Models (values differ) | — | raas |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Ground Clearance, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Runtime (Loaded), Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | EffiBOT | Sereact Robotic Putwall |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
EffiBOT, Sereact Robotic Putwall have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes EffiBOT and Sereact Robotic Putwall?
EffiBOT is made by Effidence, based in FR. Sereact Robotic Putwall is made by Sereact, based in DE.
How do EffiBOT and Sereact Robotic Putwall compare on the Robo Score?
EffiBOT scores 72.0 on the Robo Score. Sereact Robotic Putwall scores 51.9. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are EffiBOT and Sereact Robotic Putwall in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between EffiBOT and Sereact Robotic Putwall?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
EffiBOT vs Sereact Robotic Putwall compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.