EffiBOT vs VNP 30
Side-by-side comparison of EffiBOT (Effidence) and VNP 30 (VisionNav) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- EffiBOTFrance
- VNP 30China
Year First Available
- EffiBOT2015
- VNP 30—
Verified Deployments
- EffiBOT0 Deployments
- VNP 300 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- EffiBOT8 hrs
- VNP 30—
Availability Status
- EffiBOTACTIVE
- VNP 30ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- EffiBOT500 kg
- VNP 303,000 kg
AMR Subtype
- EffiBOTunit load carrier
- VNP 30pallet mover
Length
- EffiBOT1,450 mm
- VNP 30—
Width
- EffiBOT660 mm
- VNP 30—
Turning Radius
- EffiBOT1,200 mm
- VNP 302,020 mm
Min Aisle Width
- EffiBOT3,300 mm
- VNP 302,600 mm
Robot Weight
- EffiBOT140 kg
- VNP 30—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- EffiBOTslam natural
- VNP 30vision,visual slam
Pedestrian Detection
- EffiBOTYes
- VNP 30—
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- EffiBOTli ion
- VNP 30—
Battery Capacity
- EffiBOT1.6 kWh
- VNP 30—
Charging Time
- EffiBOT3.5 hrs
- VNP 30—
Safety
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- EffiBOT360 °
- VNP 30—
Connectivity
WMS Integrations
- EffiBOT—
- VNP 30WMS
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | France | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 500 kg | 3,000 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | unit load carrier | pallet mover |
| Length (values differ) | 1,450 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 660 mm | — |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | 1,200 mm | 2,020 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 3,300 mm | 2,600 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 140 kg | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | slam natural | vision,visual slam |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion | — |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 1.6 kWh | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | 3.5 hrs | — |
| Safety | ||
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | 360 ° | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| WMS Integrations (values differ) | — | WMS |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Ground Clearance, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Runtime (Loaded), Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | EffiBOT | VNP 30 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
EffiBOT, VNP 30 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes EffiBOT and VNP 30?
EffiBOT is made by Effidence, based in FR. VNP 30 is made by VisionNav, based in CN.
How do EffiBOT and VNP 30 compare on the Robo Score?
EffiBOT scores 72.0 on the Robo Score. VNP 30 scores 52.4. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are EffiBOT and VNP 30 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between EffiBOT and VNP 30?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
EffiBOT vs VNP 30 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.