EMMA L vs MiR100
Side-by-side comparison of EMMA L (IPLUSMOBOT) and MiR100 (MiR) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- EMMA LChina
- MiR100Denmark
Year First Available
- EMMA L—
- MiR1002015
Verified Deployments
- EMMA L0 Deployments
- MiR1000 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- EMMA L8 hrs
- MiR100—
Availability Status
- EMMA LACTIVE
- MiR100ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- EMMA L1,500 kg
- MiR100100 kg
AMR Subtype
- EMMA Lother
- MiR100unit load carrier
Length
- EMMA L983 mm
- MiR100—
Width
- EMMA L781 mm
- MiR100—
Turning Radius
- EMMA L942 mm
- MiR100—
Min Aisle Width
- EMMA L700 mm
- MiR100—
Robot Weight
- EMMA L—
- MiR100350 kg
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- EMMA Llidar slam
- MiR100slam natural
Localization Accuracy
- EMMA L30 mm
- MiR100—
Docking Repeatability
- EMMA L2 mm
- MiR100—
Performance
Max Speed (Loaded)
- EMMA L1.2 m/s
- MiR100—
Max Speed (Unloaded)
- EMMA L1.5 m/s
- MiR100—
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- EMMA L—
- MiR100li ion
Auto Docking
- EMMA LYes
- MiR100—
Safety
Emergency Stops
- EMMA L1
- MiR100—
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- EMMA L210 °
- MiR100—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 1,500 kg | 100 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | other | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | 983 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 781 mm | — |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | 942 mm | — |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 700 mm | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 350 kg |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam | slam natural |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | 30 mm | — |
| Docking Repeatability (values differ) | 2 mm | — |
| Performance | ||
| Max Speed (Loaded) (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | — |
| Max Speed (Unloaded) (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | — | li ion |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | 1 | — |
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | 210 ° | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Ground Clearance, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | EMMA L | MiR100 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
EMMA L, MiR100 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes EMMA L and MiR100?
EMMA L is made by IPLUSMOBOT, based in CN. MiR100 is made by MiR, based in DK.
How do EMMA L and MiR100 compare on the Robo Score?
EMMA L scores 50.8 on the Robo Score. MiR100 scores 73.1. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are EMMA L and MiR100 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between EMMA L and MiR100?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
EMMA L vs MiR100 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.