FoxLink AMR vs MiR500
Side-by-side comparison of FoxLink AMR (Foxconn Industrial Internet Co., Ltd. (Hon Hai subsidiary)) and MiR500 (MiR) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- FoxLink AMRTaiwan
- MiR500Denmark
Year First Available
- FoxLink AMR2015
- MiR5002018
Verified Deployments
- FoxLink AMR0 Deployments
- MiR5000 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- FoxLink AMR$4,718 USD
- MiR500Contact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR50017.5 hrs
Availability Status
- FoxLink AMRACTIVE
- MiR500ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR500500 kg
AMR Subtype
- FoxLink AMRother
- MiR500unit load carrier
Length
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR500800 mm
Width
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR500580 mm
Min Aisle Width
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR500850 mm
Ground Clearance
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR50025 mm
Robot Weight
- FoxLink AMR0.1 kg
- MiR50094 kg
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- FoxLink AMRother
- MiR500other
Localization Accuracy
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR50060 mm
Docking Repeatability
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR5003 mm
Obstacle Detection Range
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR5001.2 m
Min Object Detection Height
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR5009.8 cm
Pedestrian Detection
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR500Yes
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- FoxLink AMRother
- MiR500li ion
Runtime (Loaded)
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR50013 hrs
Opportunity Charging
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR500Yes
Auto Docking
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR500Yes
Charge Cycles (Rated)
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR5003000
Safety
ISO 3691-4 Certified
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR500Yes
R15.08 Certified
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR500Yes
Emergency Stops
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR5001
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- FoxLink AMR—
- MiR500360 °
Commercial
Price (USD)
- FoxLink AMR$4,718 USD
- MiR500Contact for quote
Warranty
- FoxLink AMR5 yrs
- MiR500—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Taiwan | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | 2018 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $4,718 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 17.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 500 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | other | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | — | 800 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 580 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | — | 850 mm |
| Ground Clearance (values differ) | — | 25 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 0.1 kg | 94 kg |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type | other | other |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | — | 60 mm |
| Docking Repeatability (values differ) | — | 3 mm |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | — | 1.2 m |
| Min Object Detection Height (values differ) | — | 9.8 cm |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | other | li ion |
| Runtime (Loaded) (values differ) | — | 13 hrs |
| Opportunity Charging (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Charge Cycles (Rated) (values differ) | — | 3000 |
| Safety | ||
| ISO 3691-4 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| R15.08 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | — | 1 |
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | — | 360 ° |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $4,718 USD | Contact for quote |
| Warranty (values differ) | 5 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Turning Radius, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Battery Swap, Safety Category, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | FoxLink AMR | MiR500 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $4,718 | No price |
| Payback period | 1.1 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $245,282 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +5199% | — |
MiR500 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes FoxLink AMR and MiR500?
FoxLink AMR is made by Foxconn Industrial Internet Co., Ltd. (Hon Hai subsidiary), based in TW. MiR500 is made by MiR, based in DK.
When were FoxLink AMR and MiR500 launched?
FoxLink AMR launched in 2015. MiR500 launched in 2018.
How do FoxLink AMR and MiR500 compare on the Robo Score?
FoxLink AMR scores 63.9 on the Robo Score. MiR500 scores 73.1. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are FoxLink AMR and MiR500 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between FoxLink AMR and MiR500?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
FoxLink AMR vs MiR500 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.