G1 vs MagicBot Z1
Side-by-side comparison of G1 (Unitree Robotics) and MagicBot Z1 (Magiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 G1humanoidUnitree Robotics—Trust Score | MagicBot Z1humanoidMagiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. 22.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) | 2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 126 mm | 136.9 mm |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 3 kg | 2 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 3 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 17 | 24 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 5 |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | — | 50 cm |
| Manipulation Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.5 mm | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 100 TOPS | 8-core high-performance CPU |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB | 8-core high-performance CPU |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | onboard small |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | UnifoLM-WMA-0 | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | multi task |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | joystick |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, code_ros | code_python, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime | 2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | manual swap |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | multi modal |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, ROS2 | code_python, teleoperation |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 vendor | — |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | NVIDIA Isaac Sim | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | limited rest |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | beta pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | research_development | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Weight, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Hand DOF, Grip Strength, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
G1 vs MagicBot Z1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.