GEN72-B vs P-55
Side-by-side comparison of GEN72-B (RealMan Robotics) and P-55 (FANUC) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- GEN72-BChina
- P-55Japan
Year First Available
- GEN72-B2024
- P-552025
Verified Deployments
- GEN72-B0 Deployments
- P-550 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- GEN72-BACTIVE
- P-55ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- GEN72-B2 kg
- P-5515 kg
IP Rating (Arm)
- GEN72-BIP54
- P-55—
Reach
- GEN72-B600 mm
- P-552,000 mm
Repeatability
- GEN72-B±1 mm
- P-55—
Max TCP Speed
- GEN72-B1.9 m/s
- P-55—
Robot Weight
- GEN72-B6.6 kg
- P-55—
Performance
MTBF
- GEN72-B30,000 hrs
- P-55—
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- GEN72-B統合型
- P-55R-50iA
Teach Pendant Type
- GEN72-B—
- P-55wired touch
Connectivity
IoT / Cloud Platform
- GEN72-B—
- P-55FANUC ZDT
Predictive Maintenance
- GEN72-B—
- P-55ml based
Commercial
Service Network
- GEN72-B—
- P-55global
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Japan |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 2 kg | 15 kg |
| IP Rating (Arm) (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 600 mm | 2,000 mm |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±1 mm | — |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 6.6 kg | — |
| Performance | ||
| MTBF (values differ) | 30,000 hrs | — |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | 統合型 | R-50iA |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | — | wired touch |
| Connectivity | ||
| IoT / Cloud Platform (values differ) | — | FANUC ZDT |
| Predictive Maintenance (values differ) | — | ml based |
| Commercial | ||
| Service Network (values differ) | — | global |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Degrees of Freedom, Path Accuracy, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), Duty Cycle, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, Cybersecurity Certs, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Price (USD), Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | GEN72-B | P-55 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
GEN72-B, P-55 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes GEN72-B and P-55?
GEN72-B is made by RealMan Robotics, based in CN. P-55 is made by FANUC, based in JP.
When were GEN72-B and P-55 launched?
GEN72-B launched in 2024. P-55 launched in 2025.
How do GEN72-B and P-55 compare on the Robo Index?
GEN72-B grades AA on the Robo Index. P-55 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are GEN72-B and P-55 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between GEN72-B and P-55?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
GEN72-B vs P-55 compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.