GreetingBot AD vs TORY®
Side-by-side comparison of GreetingBot AD (Beijing Orion Star Technology Co., Ltd.) and TORY® (MetraLabs) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- GreetingBot ADChina
- TORY®Germany

Year First Available
- GreetingBot AD2024
- TORY®2007

Verified Deployments
- GreetingBot AD0 Deployments
- TORY®0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- GreetingBot AD8 hrs
- TORY®—

Availability Status
- GreetingBot ADACTIVE
- TORY®ACTIVE

Physical
IP Rating
- GreetingBot ADIP23
- TORY®—

Payload
- GreetingBot AD4 kg
- TORY®—

Robot Weight
- GreetingBot AD32.5 kg
- TORY®—

Dimensions
- GreetingBot AD498x465x1280
- TORY®—

Navigation & Safety
Navigation Type
- GreetingBot ADlidar slam,vision
- TORY®lidar slam,vision

Max Speed
- GreetingBot AD1.2 m/s
- TORY®—

Min Passable Width
- GreetingBot AD60 cm
- TORY®—

Power
Battery Runtime
- GreetingBot AD8 hrs
- TORY®—

Charge Time
- GreetingBot AD4.5 hrs
- TORY®—

Auto Docking
- GreetingBot ADYes
- TORY®—

Hot-Swap Battery
- GreetingBot ADNo
- TORY®—

Integration
Floor Compatibility
- GreetingBot ADhard floor,low pile carpet
- TORY®hard floor

Display & UX
Display Size
- GreetingBot AD21.5 "
- TORY®—

Voice Interaction
- GreetingBot ADYes
- TORY®—

Languages Supported
- GreetingBot ADEnglish, Chinese, Japanese
- TORY®—

| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | 2007 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical | ||
| IP Rating (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | IP23 | — |
| Payload (values differ) | 4 kg | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 32.5 kg | — |
| Dimensions (values differ) | 498x465x1280 | — |
| Navigation & Safety | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam,vision | lidar slam,vision |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 1.2 m/s | — |
| Min Passable Width (values differ) | 60 cm | — |
| Power | ||
| Battery Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Charge Time (values differ) | 4.5 hrs | — |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Hot-Swap Battery (values differ) | No | — |
| Integration | ||
| Floor Compatibility (values differ) | hard floor,low pile carpet | hard floor |
| Display & UX | ||
| Display Size (values differ) | 21.5 " | — |
| Voice Interaction (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Languages Supported (values differ) | English, Chinese, Japanese | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Tray Count, Compartment Type, Elevator API, PMS / POS Integration, Fleet Management, Noise Level, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Warranty
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | GreetingBot AD | TORY® |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
GreetingBot AD, TORY® have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes GreetingBot AD and TORY®?
GreetingBot AD is made by Beijing Orion Star Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. TORY® is made by MetraLabs, based in DE.
When were GreetingBot AD and TORY® launched?
GreetingBot AD launched in 2024. TORY® launched in 2007.
How do GreetingBot AD and TORY® compare on the Robo Index?
GreetingBot AD grades BBB on the Robo Index. TORY® grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are GreetingBot AD and TORY® in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Hospitality Service on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Hospitality Service robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Hospitality Service TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between GreetingBot AD and TORY®?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Service Robot TCO Across Hotels, Restaurants, Retail, and Senior Care
9 min readService Robots
Service Robot SLAs and Contract Red Flags
10 min readService Robots
Service Robot Pilot: A 60-Day Evaluation Framework
10 min readService Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
GreetingBot AD vs TORY® compares two robots in the hospitality-service category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.